Because they edit their own wikipedia page to say they don't taste very good.
Yes some species of cacti are food for animals.
Ones that haven't eaten
because some animals get eaten by other animals or get shot by hunters, making less in the world.
The ability for some animals to look like other animals to avoid being eaten.
Zoos keep animals to help them. They to keep some of the animals so when they are about to go extinct then there will be some left on earth.
Yes, contrary to popular belief, not all animals are severely abused and/or living in filth before they are prepared to be consumed. Therefore there are some animals that are not good enough to be eaten.
When it eats some animals, but could also be eaten by other animals
It ripens. It can then fall off what it has been growing on or it can be picked by people or animals. Some of it will be eaten. Some will rot. Some of the seeds in the fruits may survive to start new plants.
Many Sikhs eat many kinds of animals, so this is not true.
Depends on the animal. Some would be hunted and eaten, some would hunt and eat other animals, and the rest would starve to death or become roadkill (and would then be eaten by scavengers).
Cacti can be eaten by certain animals such as deer, rabbits, and some insects. However, most animals avoid eating cacti due to their spines and bitter taste.
some animals are wet from sweat or they have recently been in the water. most snakes and frogs are slimey because they must keep wet to survive.