Let us assume we have a linked list similar to the following setup:
struct linked_list_node {
int data;
struct linked_list_node *next;
};
struct linked_list {
int size;
struct linked_list_node *root;
};
// reverses the order of the nodes in list
void reverseList(struct linked_list *list) {
struct linked_list_node *current = list->root;
struct linked_list_node *next = current->next;
struct linked_list_node *last = list->root;
// the old root will be the new end, so must point to null
list->root->next = NULL;
while( next != NULL ) {
// update current node
current = next;
// update next node for the next iteration so we don't lose the pointer
next = current->next;
// actual reversal - the current node should point to the last node
current->next = last;
// update lastNode
last = current;
}
// point the original list to the new root
list->root = current;
}
It is easier to insert into a singly linked list.
You copy a singly linked list into a doubly linked list by iterating over the singly linked list and, for each element, calling the doubly linked list insert function.
zsd
Which of the following data structures can be randomly accessed giving loc?A. linked list implemented using arrayB. singly linked listC. double linked listD. both single and double linked listThe answer is A.
Advantages of single linked list: # Decrease in storage space per linked list node # Simpler implementation Advantages of double linked list # Decrease in work when accessing a random node # Decrease in work when inserting or deleting a node
A doubly linked list can be traversed in both directions (forward and backward). A singly linked list can only be traversed in one direction. A node on a doubly linked list may be deleted with little trouble, since we have pointers to the previous and next nodes. A node on a singly linked list cannot be removed unless we have the pointer to its predecessor. On the flip side however, a doubly linked list needs more operations while inserting or deleting and it needs more space (to store the extra pointer).
In_which_way_Doubly_linked_list_better_than_singly_linked_list
A simple linked-list is an approach is to store the freelist of memory blocks, where each node of the linked list contains a pointer to a single free block in the memory pool.
3 pointers...
This is not a problem but indicates that you have reached the end of the list.
A heterogeneous linked list is a linked list where each node can store different types of data. This is different from a homogeneous linked list where all nodes store the same type of data. Heterogeneous linked lists can be useful for scenarios where you need to store multiple types of data in a single list.
Answersingly linked list has the node inserted only at one end. and the pointer corresponds to the next pointer.but in a doubly linked list, the node pointer points to the both previous and the next node.singly linked list has two nodesdoubly linked list has three nodesA doubly linked list makes sense when you need to traverse the list in both directions. You aren't able to do that with a singly linked list.