Protection is automatic as soon as it is recorded.
In music, the lyrics and music can be registered separately or together, and sound recordings have their own rights.
The book has a copyright. The music has a copyright. The musical production has copyright. The movie has a copyright. The sound track has a copyright. Music not used in the movie has copyright. The play was first produced on Broadway in 1957, meaning it is copyrighted until 95 years later. The movie was produced in 1962 and has 95 years of copyright. The sound recordings of the music produced prior to 1973 have no federal copyright but are protected by state laws until 2067, not including those works that were also part of the 1962 dramatic audiovisual work, which are covered by federal copyright for 95 years.
Twentieth Century-Fox.
Barbara Alice Ringer has written: 'The unauthorized duplication of sound recordings' -- subject(s): Copyright, Music, Recording and reproducing, Sound 'The demonology of copyright' -- subject(s): Copyright, History
copyright of music belongs to the sound recording company, composer and lyrics writer if the music is quite old (mozart etc) you can publish it, otherwise it is a copyright infringement to publish music on youtube without the owners permission The best way to avoid copyright infringement on YouTube is to post only content that is entirely your original work.
I believe it isRodgers and Hammerstein in 1959 from the musical Sound of Music.
A&M Records, a division of Universal Music Group.
In order to download the Sound of Music without violating copyright laws, the movie would have to be purchased. Their are many different providers such as iTunes that will sell the movie for a price.
First, you do not need to apply for a copyright unless you plan to enforce it; your songs were copyrighted automatically the moment they were written on paper. The "music", if any, would have its own copyright once it is composed and recorded, whether it is put onto paper or not. In fact, each new sound recording of a new performance of the music is a slightly different "creation" and would have its own "sound recording" copyright, which is owned by the performers or producer.
No, but any sound recording of a performance of Grieg's music may still be copyrighted according to when it was created and the laws of the country where it was produced. For example, in the USA, any recording published prior to 1972 is copyrighted until 2067 when state copyright laws become preempted by federal copyright.
The owner of a copyright in music has the exclusive right to perform the work
Yes. Sound recordings of music have two types of protection: for the song itself, and for the performance.