It's a very interesting question and the answer is not altogether obvious. I think a defensible argument would be: Anything with a reproductive system that is genetics-based is living; all else is not.
biotic is where something is nonliving and abiotic is something that is living or was living
Personification.
No, something nonliving cannot become living. Living organisms are characterized by complex biological processes such as growth, reproduction, and metabolism. These processes require specific organic molecules and structures that nonliving things do not possess.
Biologists determine whether a thing is living or nonliving by a list of characteristics. These characteristics include the ability to reproduce, the ability to eat, the ability to grow and the ability to excrete waste.
its something that's not alive and its not a living thing
There is some debate about the status of a virus, whether it is living, not living, or some intermediary condition.
if your asking what is the difference living is something that is alive and i think you get the point that ........... nonliving is ...............................DEAD. Or never was alive what ever you guys like best.
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
Sand, soil, rocks, gravel, water, air and light are abiotic (nonliving) factors of the desert. All living creatures, whether plant or animal, are biotic (living) factors.
non-living things are things that doesn't have life
Because most fruit grows from a living thing like a tree. And an egg comes from a live chicken
Nonliving THINGS do not contain cells, however ALL THINGS, whether living or non-living, do contain atoms.