answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

You cannot and here is an outline of the proof. It depends on two things:

  • digital root (DR): The digital root of an integer is the sum of all its digits. If the result is greater than 9 you calculate the DR of the sum and continue until you get below 10.
  • divisibility rule for 9: An integer is divisible by 9 if and only if its DR is 9 (or 0).

The digital root of any two-digit number is the sum of their digital roots. That is DR(42) = 4 + 2 = DR(4) + DR(2).

That result can be generalised and used to show that, however you try to group the 9 digits before summing (for example 12 + 38 + 4 + 5 + 967), the DR is always the same as 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 45 = 9

--------------------------------------------------------

In the above example,

DR(12) + DR(38) + DR(4) + DR(5) + DR(967)

= DR(1)+DR(2)+DR(3)+DR(8)+DR(4)+DR(5)+DR(9)+DR(6)+DR(7)

= DR(1)+DR(2)+DR(3)+DR(4)+DR(5)+DR(6)+DR(7)+DR(8)+DR(9) - on reordering

= 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9

--------------------------------------------------------

So if you use the digits only once, DR(Sum) = 9 and so, by the divisibility rule, the number must be divisible by 9.

But 100 is not divisible by 9. So the sum cannot be 100.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you get to 100 by adding 1-9 only plus and usind each number only once?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the GCD 220 and 462?

There is really no such thing as a "greatest common denominator". Once you find the least common denominator of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCD to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common denominator of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest denominator.There is really no such thing as a "greatest common denominator". Once you find the least common denominator of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCD to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common denominator of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest denominator.There is really no such thing as a "greatest common denominator". Once you find the least common denominator of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCD to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common denominator of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest denominator.There is really no such thing as a "greatest common denominator". Once you find the least common denominator of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCD to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common denominator of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest denominator.


What is the highest number that is a factor of both 12 and 30?

There is no such number. Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be higher than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a highestmultiple.


How do you make -10 using only numbers 1-9 by adding and subtraction and only use each number once?

I may be wrong but it seems impossible. There probably is proof somewhere if it is.


What is 18 and 24 gcm?

There is no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the largest number that is both a multiple of 4 and 5?

There is really no such thing as a largest multiple. Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the HCM of 32 and 48?

There is really so such thing as a "highest common multiple." Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a highest multiple.


What is the GCM of 6 and 12?

There is really so such thing as a "greatest common multiple." Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the gcd of 64 and 72?

There is really no such thing as a "greatest common denominaot". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the gcm for 15 and 20?

There is really no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the gcm of 1000 and 894?

There is really no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple..


What is the gcm of 8 and 28?

There is really no such thing as a "greatest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.


What is the HCM of 8 and 5?

There is really no such thing as a "highest common multiple". Once you find the least common multiple of a set of numbers, you can keep adding the LCM to itself over and over again. Each new number you get will be a common multiple of your set of numbers, but each new number will always be larger than the previous. This means that you can keep adding while the number approaches infinity and you will still never find a greatest multiple.