0
Because if it didnt, the two superpowers would have started a nuclear war which would have begun world war 3
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Cant start 1995 corolla after putting in secondhand fuel pump that i was assured worked any ideas?
Maybe its not the fuel pump itself.
Why is Saint Lorenzo Ruiz a saint?
Lorenzo worked as a missionary in Japan and was martyred because of his work. This martyrdom pretty much assured him of sainthood.
How many hours do rns work?
I was told that they worked 16hrs or more. Hours worked will be paid fairly. It really depends. I was told that they worked 16hrs or more. Hours worked will be paid fairly. It really depends.
Has anyone in a trustworthy organization worked with Everest debt solution?
I work with Bank Of America in the collections department and I can say that at my regular job I have worked with Everest Debt Solutions. They have a great staff and work with their clients to reach mutually agreeable solutions that fit our guidelines. I would work with them.
Who worked hard for womens suffrage?
every one that was in it worked really hard to get the 19th amendment to be passed
For which reform movement did women work?
They worked for equal rights. They worked for labor issues. There are really a lot.
How did beyonce achieve her Grammys?
She worked really hard!
Where can you find free music?
Loudtronix.com has worked really well for me.
Luis worked really hard on his science project worked is a what kind of verb?
"worked" here is an intransitive verb, because it has no direct object. The sentence does not say what was worked by Luis. In the sentence, "Luis worked the problem very quickly.", worked is transitive because it has a direct object, the problem was worked.
How did the idea that both the US and the Soviet Union needed thousands of nuclear weapons actually make the world safer?
Well the general idea was a thing called "MAD" which was an acronym for mutually assured destruction. The idea, as crazy as it sounds, was that if either country launched an attack both would proceed to completely destroy the other. Sometime in the 1960's the think tanks came up with the idea that they could replace MAD with a program that linked every countries money to everyone else. Thus started the free trade agreements. The idea being that if we were all linked by economics we'd be better neighbors and work things out together. It replaced MAD but many scholars today, especially with the world economy as it is, believe it was naive and hasn't worked.
If nuclear deterrence worked during the cold war should it not become a policy for many nations in the post -cold war era?
In today's post-cold war atmosphere, the concept of deterrence, specifically Mutually Assured Destruction, does not fit congruently with international relations, military and otherwise.The deterrence that existed in the cold war assumed certain conditions which may not be applicable in today's conflicts. For example, cold war deterrence assumes that leaders truly care about the survival of their subjects, and that there are no rogue leaders with access to nuclear power who would initiate a first strike without contemplating the return of fire. Besides these reasons, there were many instances when deterrence, though coming through in the end of the day, (the Cuban Missile Crisis) almost failed humanity. The answer to the question then, is this: plausible, but not a good path to go down if it can be avoided. Bottom line is it worked in the Cold War but came very close to failing, and it requires inherently unsafe conditons.
How do you test a boy's faithfulness and truthfulness?
if you have a bestfriend you can REALLY REALLY trust, use them to tempt your boy. it has always worked for me :)
