THINK. The police or sherrif will tell you - right before they put the handcuffs on and take you to jail.
Not in the United States. First you have to be charged, which at that point, you obviously know you are being charged. Then, arraigned, where you plead and request bail, which at that point, they may put you under house arrest. But my point is, you have to be charged and then arraigned to be placed under house arrest, so there is no way you would not know of this.
you're under arrest
you're under arrest
you're under arrest
Not legally.Additional: The police cannot lie about the circumstances in order to arrest you - HOWEVER - If you are undergoing interrogation the police are under no requirement to tell you the truth about what they know.
You sir, are under arrest for the crime of theft.
The law enforcement officer has to tell you that you are under arrest and they have to read you the Miranda Rights. If they have not told you that you are under arrest, they can simply have you "detained". If they have not told you that you are under arrest, and you are not in handcuffs, you are free to go.
yes they do check you. Typically, as part of the arrest process, there is a search. However, depending upon the circumstances, the search may take place before the arrest, or you may be under arrest and the search can take place after.
He wasn't under house arrest.
He was put under military arrest.
A fugitive escapes from being under arrest.
If they have not declared you 'under arrest', and read you your Miranda rights, then you are not under arrest, you are just in police custody. That would be a good time to consult your lawyer.Another View: (in the US) Whether you are told, "You are under arrest," or not, BELIEVE ME, if you are taken to the police station and are not free to decline the trip, you ARE under arrest.ALSO; You do NOT have to be read your Miranda Rights at the time of your arrest. You must only be advised of them PRIOR to the start of any questioning about the offense.