answersLogoWhite

0

Warrant Officers are not responsible for troops or personnel. But, in referring to a Warrant Officer, face to face you would address him as "Sir" as any other officer. If you work with him or are more familiar, he may permit you to refer to him as "Chief." If referring to a Warrant Officer in a conversation with a third party, you would refer to him as "Warrant Officer __________."

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is an officer in charge of a regiment called?

An officer in charge of a regiment is called a commanding officer. This individual is responsible for overseeing the operation, discipline, and administration of the regiment.


What is the full form of co in department of police?

circle officer


What are the duties chief master at arms?

personal STAFF OF CO,TO ASSIST THE COMMANDING OFFICER IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES AND GUIDELINES, BRIDGE OF EM TO THE COMMANDING OFFICER,RESPONSIBLE IN MORALE & WELFARE


Warrant officer rank measurement?

WO2 (Warrant Officer 2nd Grade) - WO1 (Warrant Officer 1st Grade) - CWO (Chief Warrant Officer).


What was the commanding officer union of Vicksburg?

The commanding Union officer was U.S. Grant.


What rank is after warrant officer in Halo?

Warrant officer


Who is responsible for reporting the status of weapons and the explosives to safety program to the commanding officer?

ESO


Who is the chief warrant officer of 52 air cadets?

The chief warrant officer of 52 air cadets is warrant officer Spurley


Who is responsible for reporting the status of weapons and the explosive safety program directly to the commanding officer?

ESO


Who is responsible for reporting status of weapons and the explosives safety program directly to the commanding officer?

ESO


Who is responsible for reporting the status of weapons and the explosives safety program directly to the commanding officer?

ESO


When a police officer arrests someone based on an improperly issued warrant the warrant protects the officer from liability?

If the officer reasonably believes the warrant is valid, then the officer is protected from any legal (or civil) consequence. However, the key phrase to that is "the officer reasonably believes".If someone manages to prove that the officer "should have known better", or that the officer lied in order to have the warrant issued, the officer can be held liable, as they knew the warrant was invalid.