"More than one witness" doesn't require any punctuation.
Both examples are correct. For ONE witness, you would write "witness's answers" (using the apostrophe AND the 's'). For the plural, MORE THAN ONE witness, it is acceptable to omit the 's' : "witnesses' answers".
The items should be separated by commas.
Witness is the correct spelling when referring to a single person."The witness has arrived in court".Witnesses is correct when referring to more than one person."The witnesses were vital to the case".
this is how to punctuate it! You use , ? ! " ) ( - / $ & haha
It depends on how many witness signatures there are, most places require at least two. If there is more than one copy, and the witness remembers signing one of the copies, they can attest to that in court, but that can be suspect in trying to prove that the one they signed was identical to the one being presented.If it was a typed will, there could be a problem, particularly if someone contests the will. If no one contests the will, the executor can use it to distribute the estate.
The possessive witness's pertains to something associated with a singular witness. The possessive witnesses' pertains to association with more than one individual witness (witnesses). (The exception here is for the plural ending in 's', which allows omission of the additional possessive 's', for written clarity and ease of pronunciation. Note that the singular possessive is pronounced identically to the plural AND plural possessive.)
The possessive witness's pertains to something associated with a singular witness. The possessive witnesses' pertains to association with more than one individual witness (witnesses). (The exception here is for the plural ending in 's', which allows omission of the additional possessive 's', for written clarity and ease of pronunciation. Note that the singular possessive is pronounced identically to the plural AND plural possessive.)
It means that one person (who allegedly witnessed something) is giving a differing account of what happened than another witness to the same event.
The correct punctuation for the phrase "each others' passwords" is exactly as you provided it: with the apostrophe after "others." This is because it's indicating possession by more than one person (each other's).
You put a comma between them, but unless you have a MA/MS or a Ph.d you don't place a degree after your name. An AA or a BS/BA are not graduate degrees and you will embarrass yourself if you place them after your name.
There is an answer and this will make sense. Try this: "That that is, is. That that is not, is not. Is that it? It is!" --- There is no way the sentence can be punctuated because it doesn't make sense. In order to properly punctuate a sentence, there must be some element of common sense in the structure. This is just a random string of is that it. --- Rather than using one or more punctuation marks, I would prefer to use an editing mark and draw a line through the entire text indicating that it should be deleted in its entirety. ---
The possessive witness's pertains to something associated with a singular witness. The possessive witnesses' pertains to association with more than one individual witness (witnesses). (The exception here is for the plural ending in 's', which allows omission of the additional possessive 's', for written clarity and ease of pronunciation. Note that the singular possessive is pronounced identically to the plural AND plural possessive.)