They are incorrectly arranged to form any Roman numeral.
But as MCCCLXXVI = 1376
As far as I know Roman numbers go from the highest number letter on the left to smallest on the right. As such this string of letters looks incorrect. XXLMMXI It looks like it should read MMLXXXI. M=1000 L=50 X=10 I=1 the conversion on this roman numeral is 2081
It is not a proper Roman Numeral. It could be read to be 1990, or 1010
1987 in Roman numerals would be MCMLXXXVII
It is: (V) which means 1000*5 = 5000
XIX
The Romans would have read this as: X = 10, L = 50, I = 1 or 61 However in the Middle Ages "lazy" monks developed a shorthand form where the letters in reversed order subtract, so they and we now read this as: XL = 40, I = 1 or 41
It varies from person to person. Some may find it easier to understand and remember pictorial images, while others may prefer verbal descriptions. It depends on individual learning styles and preferences.
As with the Roman alphabet, which you may be familiar with it (since you are using it to read this answer), different letters have different symmetries.
the Roman numeral 'MCMXCII' in modern numbers is 1992. Symbols are written and read from left to right, from highest to lowest. If number MCMXCII is within to text or sentence it should be read in its equivalent in arabic numbers, in this case 1992.
To write "name III," you would simply write the word "name" followed by the Roman numeral "III."
Take the middle two letters of FIVE and read as Roman numerals.
XXI-IIII-MDCCCCLXXXIIII (1984) or XXI-IV-IVXMM (2000-16). Note that 1984 in Roman numerals is not MCMLXXXIV as you might have been told or read.