I think since Jesus was known a lot that they can just remember it.
The 4 Gospels were written by 4 people about one Jesus.
The gospels were written for early Christian communities in the first century to share the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. They were intended to instruct, inspire, and strengthen the faith of believers and to provide a written record of Jesus's ministry for future generations.
If you are referring to the written gospels such as Matthew, Mark etc, then these were used in churches and copied as soon as they were written. The synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke were all written and in use before 70 AD. The Gospel of John is considered to have been written somewhat later, towards the end of the first century AD, and was used from then onwards. If you mean the Gospel in terms of the good news brought by Jesus, then this was 'used' from the moment that people began to hear Him preach from around 30AD.
No. The four Gospels ('Gospel' means good news) are accounts by four of Jesus' contemporaries (and maybe one near-contemporary) about what Jesus said, what He did, where He went, to whom He spoke, etc. The Gospels contain references to God's people before Jesus' time (mostly made by Jesus Himself), but they are included only incidentally to the main thrust of the Scripture. The Gospels' principal focus is on Jesus.
A:They were different people. All the New Testament gospels were originally anonymous, and New Testament scholars say that none of the gospels could have been written by an eyewitness to the events portrayed. It was only later in the second century that the Church Fathers decided to attribute the gospels to the persons whose names they now bear.
AnswerIf you are a Christian, why not praise God with like-minded gay people? If you regard them as sinners, remember that the gospels say that Jesus associated with sinners.
A:All four New Testament gospels were originally anonymous and only attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John later in the second century. The gospel now known as John's Gospel was actually attributed to Cyrenthus before finally being attributes to John. The attributions to Matthew, Mark, Luke and Johnmean that Matthew and John were then considered to be witten by Jesus' disciples, while Mark and Luke were not.Modern New Testament scholars say that there is no good reason to accept the traditional attributions, and that none of the gospels could have been written by an eyewitness to the events portrayed. On this evidence, all the New Testament gospels were written by people who were not disciples.
A Christian tradition says that Matthew, Luke, Mark and John were the authors of the gospels that bear their names. Certainly the gospels were written by real, historical people, but they were originally anonymous works. It was only later in the second century that the Church Fathers attributed each of the New Testament gospels to the apostle they thought most likely to have written the book. The existence of the gospels is therefore not proof that people known as Matthew, Luke, Mark and John were historical people. As to whether the apostles of those names were historical people, there is no extra-biblical evidence. It is possible to believe in their likely existence on the basis of biblical testimony, but it is not possible to prove that they really were historical people.
it's the day before easter
The Gospels talk of thousands of people that came to hear Jesus speak, to be forgiven and to be healed.
There is an perhaps unjustified assumption that the gospels are in fact reliable historical documents. Most people believe that they were written by eyewitnesses to the life of Jesus, or at least (for example, Luke) people who had met and learnt from eyewitnesses. However, the clear majority of modern scholars no longer support that view.Belief that the gospels are reliable historical documents must remain a matter of faith, and can not be proven.
There is few things known about people who lived before history was written. Only God knows about those people.