You just have to understand Shakespeare or get help from a teacher, friend, or family member.
The more you read the lines, the easier they will be to understand.
No! I am very fond of Shakespeare and have read 5 of his plays. He is a very skilled writer.
Understanding Shakespeare's Theatre helps one to understand his plays and why they were written in the way they were. This in turn is enormously important as educated persons the world over understand at least the most well-known of Shakespeare's plays, and everyone knows and constantly quotes lines drawn from those plays. Answer: It is not important.
They suggest rearranging the word order of the line
If I understand your syntax, over four hundred film and television productions have been made from Shakespeare's plays.
William Shakespeare did not write novels.The novel, as we understand it today, did not appear until the 18th Century, some 150 years after Shakespeare's death.Most scholars believe that Shakespeare's last play - not written as a collboration - was The Tempest dated to around 1611.
when they are in modern English, they are very beautiful. But when they are in Elizabethan, there is a lot that I really don't understand.
Not Old English, which is a totally different language that neither you nor Shakespeare could comprehend. Nor even Middle English, which Chaucer wrote in, and which you and Shakespeare could understand if it were written, but neither could understand when spoken. No, Shakespeare wrote exclusively in Modern English. You could understand Shakespeare if he spoke to you, although you might think his accent made him sound a bit like a pirate. (The particular dialect of English he used is called Early Modern English)
William Shakespeare; it is a line from Hamlet's soliloquy in the play 'Hamlet' (act 3, scene 1).
Shakespeare used as his source material Life of Caesarand Life of Brutus, both by Plutarch (a 1st century AD Roman historian).
The main reason Shakespeare's plays are difficult for modern readers to understand is that they are mostly written in poetry and quite dense and difficult poetry at that. Shakespeare also often writes in long and complicated sentences which are tricky to unravel. Although a lot of people focus on unusual words in Shakespeare's vocabulary, these are not the most significant reasons why his plays are hard to understand. For example, Macbeth says "But here, upon this bank and shoal of time, we'd jump the life to come." Every word is a perfectly ordinary modern word which Shakespeare uses with its modern meaning. There isn't even the odd syntax he sometimes uses to improve the rhythm of his lines. And yet this is a difficult line to understand. Why does Shakespeare have Macbeth compare time to a river, and the present to a bank or shoal? Why jump the future?
Well, for a start, Chaucer lived some 200 years before Shakespeare did. And although they both spoke English, Shakespeare spoke Modern English but Chaucer spoke Middle English, which means that they would not have been able to understand each other. Another difference is that Shakespeare was a professional writer. Chaucer was not; he was a civil servant.