Want this question answered?
An autobiography is a work of nonfiction, as it is a written account of a person's life, narrated by that person themselves. It aims to communicate events and experiences as accurately as possible, based on the author's memory and perspective.
An autobiography is the story of the person's life - it doesn't have a "plot" because it's not fiction. Nonfiction books are true.
Autobiography is a subset of literary nonfiction. Literary nonfiction encompasses a broader category of nonfiction works that includes essays, biographies, and literary journalism, whereas autobiography specifically refers to an individual's account of their own life.
Autobiographies are considered nonfiction because they are written by the person who experienced the events being described. They recount real events from the author's life.
A genuine autobiography, or indeed any biography, is a work of nonfiction. It would be possible to write a work of fiction in the form of a biography (for example, "Tarzan Alive" by Philip Jose Farmer) but in that case it is not a true biography.
It is definitely non-fiction well the people are but the actual film and book is not real
fiction
Neither. JD Salinger is dead.
how fiction text is easier to understand then nonfiction text is that the only difference is that in fiction text the writer is stretching the truth while in nonfiction text the writer is limited to what they can say or write about. so to some people fiction text is easier to understand then nonfiction text is , or fiction text is harder to understand while nonfiction text is easier. its really your choice and your understanding.
An atlas is considered non-fiction because it contains factual information about geography, maps, and other related data. It is a reference book that provides information about the world's countries, regions, and locations.
nonfiction
Fiction