What you may consider is:
Variety of content exhibited in the museum.
The overall architecture and style, placing of the content in the museum.
The description and depth in analysis of the contents.
Technical in-sight and interactiveness of the audience with the content.
The security, condition of the Museum.
Is it "worth the price".
What are the unique points in that museum, what makes(or doesn't make) that museum stand out.
critique the WtA gap analysis for the museum of art and design in Helsinki Are there any other explanations for the gaps?
I'm afraid there isn't information about a lab you're supposed to critique.
A movie critique describes a viewers impressions of a film, along with a brief summary of the movie's plot. Movie critiques are typically written in an essay style.
The fact that you just really like the author's name
The Tagalog word for critique is "pagsusuri" or "pamamasuri."
Immanuel Kant is the author of the book. The book is also referred to as Kant's first critique. It is followed by the second critique, Critique of Practical Reason.
Critique of Judgment was created in 1790.
Critique of Anthropology was created in 2000.
博物館 hakubutsukan.
WikiAnswers is not really a writing critique site. I have linked some good writing critique sites for you below - also, some Related Questions about how to edit and critique your own work!
Critique of Practical Reason was created in 1788.
New German Critique was created in 1974.