Want this question answered?
While the Law is an extremely complicated subject, and only an attorney is competent to say for sure, in general it is the responsibility of the accuser, or Plaintiff, to prove that what he/she says is true.
burden of proof
the Federal Insanity Defense Reform Act
The clause beyond reasonable doubt simply means that there is enough evidence to convince the judge that you have committed the act or in other word, the crime.That is the standard which must be met for conviction of a defendant in a criminal trial. Notice that the standard is not, "beyond ALL doubt," - only beyond REASONABLE doubt.REASONABLE DOUBT - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean beyond ALL doubt.See below link:
S. C. Sarkar has written: 'mistake of fact in evidence act Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law) 'mistake of fact in evidence act Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)' 'Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)'
eat, sleep, reproduce and act as a beast of burden for man
eat, sleep, reproduce and act as a beast of burden for man
of Load, The act of putting a load on or into., A load; cargo; burden.
The act of coming under., The act of relieving, as of a burden; support; aid; assistance; help., A government aid or bounty., To subventionize.
The definition of "Evidence" in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is in itself complete. The expression of the word in the Act is inclusive rather than conclusive. The Act in interpreting "Evidence" is relatively indicative of ascertainment of the magnitude of appreciation of the evidence. It is expressed in the Act as signification of the words uttered and things exhibited by witnesses before a Court of Justice. The definition of "Evidence" covers (a) the evidence of witnesses, and (b) documentary evidence. It does not cover everything that Court has before it. "Evidence" is adduced to prove or disprove any fact the truth of which is submitted to judicial investigation. Thus, mere inclusion of something as evidence without significance of its exhibition to establish logical inference of facts existence can be regarded as inconclusive interpretation of the expression.
To incriminate someone means to provide evidence or information that suggests their involvement in a crime or wrongful act. This can happen through witness statements, physical evidence, or other types of proof that implicate the person in question.
generally as little as possible, except to eat, reproduce and act a a beast of burden for man