Want this question answered?
He compares the people of the Philippines to children who are governed without consent
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans. He also compared the people in the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.
He says that some people are not capable of self-government and pointed out that the United States already does it with Native Americans.
Beveridge said that some people were not capable of self-government.He pointed out that the US continues to do this with Native Americans, although they have their own local government powers.He points out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.He says that some people are not capable of self-government.He compares the with the people of the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
By consent of the people.
No, the Revolution got rid of the "monarchy", or Czars and Czarinas, and put the "people" in charge of governing the country.
majority of the people
In a democracy, the source of power of the government comes from the consent of the governed, meaning the authority of the government is derived from the people through processes like elections and representation. This principle is known as popular sovereignty.