Want this question answered?
To show a logical line of reasoning
rhetoric; pathos
rhetoric; pathos
It sounds to me like a description of 2 or more people having a debate, argument or lively discussion that is weak in substance, but that is full of inflated language. Excellent speakers can use rhetoric skillfully to persuade listeners that their position is correct. But it has to be used sparingly and with logical and intelligent substance underlying the argument. Some people are so good at "rhetoric" that the rhetoric itself becomes a battle of wits, or a battle of words. The substance of the argument goes out the window, along with logic and clear thought. It's difficult to describe rhetoric in a few words, but you might find links below as they are found.
His rhetoric is persuasive.
Rhetoric is the art of convincing people verbally. Rhetorical questions are used in an argument when asking a question forces the listener to think of an argument that they might not otherwise have considered. A well-constructed rhetorical question will both direct the listener's thoughts to a question they hadn't considered, and also have only one sensible answer, being the one the writer wanted.
Novelist use rhetoric through the use of vivid story elements, novelists can motivate readers to believe the events of a story.
If politicians didn't use rhetoric, they'd have to go out and get an honest job.
aristotle in his treatise on the subject defined rhetoric
a question that has no answer
You could use the tittle "the argument"
None of the above