Since the USA is a member of NATO, NATO is far superior. NATO _without_ American support would be a pushover to the Russians.
A big part of that is that NATO is overreliant on American power. If they had to defend themselves with only their own resources, then most of the NATO nations would be forced to severely curtail their social welfare state and invest more heavily in defense.
Well yes and no. NATO was formed after WWII as an alliance against communist agression of countries in Europe that considered themselves allies of the United states. The communists formed the Warsaw Pact which was the communist countries that condidered themselves aligned with Russia to protect themselves from aggression by the west. So they are not really for or against each other. It is more like they have agreed to disagree and keep a close eye on each other.
NATO says it's used to guard against limited missile attacks. Russia thinks it might be used to attack west.
To counter militarily and economically NATO
NATO wants Ukraine and Georgia to join. Russia doesn't like that.
To counter militarily and economically NATO
I think There will be no war between Russia and America. American wants to use NATO forces against Russia, but NATO is reluctant. Moreover, America want to use QUAED against China. But India is reluctant against Russia and China. It is America, who wants war. American economy depends mostly on Weapons and War. Is UNO still alive to stop America indulging in war?
Hungary!! its not Russia
No. Even if it was militarily invaded I'm pretty sure NATO would help defend it
Russia
England is part of the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is politically allied to the European Union and militarily allied to NATO.
NATO
No, the berlin blockade happened before NATO. This pact was a response to the berlin blockade - it stated that all countries should come together for a mutal defence against acts of aggression - in this case they were indicating it about Russia.