answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The appeals system is a little complicated, but essentially: the person who has received the death penalty would need to appeal to the Supreme Court and then the Supreme Court would have to grant a writ of certiorari.

The "complicated" part comes from the fact that it would have been appealed to lower courts (the state Supreme Court, or a Circuit Court of Appeals) before the US Supreme Court would agree to hear the appeal.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does a death penalty case get to the supreme court?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Has the United States always had the death penalty?

The United States has not always had the death penalty. In 1972 the United States Supreme Court called for a moratorium on the death penalty with the case of Furman v. Georgia and brought it back in 1976 with the case of Gregg v. Georgia.


Does any supreme court have to hear a case?

State supreme courts (or their equivalent) typically have mandatory jurisdiction over certain types of cases, such as death penalty appeals. The US Supreme Court has full discretion over which cases they review.


Furman vs Georgia?

The case of Furman v. Georgia took place in 1972. The Supreme Court had to decide on the requirement for a degree of consistency in giving the death penalty.


What US Supreme Court cases supported the death penalty?

The Supreme Court has never declared that the death penalty is unconstitutional. In the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, the Court ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional as applied in three specific cases. This effectively put a moratorium on the death penalty as lower courts struggled to determine when (or if) the death penalty could be applied. The Furman opinion was per curium, with each of the nine justices writing their own opinions (5 concurring and 4 dissenting).Four years later, in 1976, the Supreme Court made clear in the case of Gregg v. Georgia that the death penalty wasconstitutional. Georgia had amended their death penalty statute in the interceding four years and now had additional protections for the defendant in capital cases, including a two-phased trial: one for guilt and one for sentencing.The Court in Gregg summarized Furman thusly:"While Furman did not hold that the infliction of the death penalty per se violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, it did recognize that the penalty of death is different in kind from any other punishment imposed under our system of criminal justice. Because of the uniqueness of the death penalty, Furman held that it could not be imposed under sentencing procedures that created a substantial risk that it would be inflicted in an arbitrary and capricious manner."


What type of case was Baze v Rees?

It was a constitutional challenge to the death penalty based on the "cruel and unusual" punishment aspect of death by lethal injection. The US Supreme Court decided the case in 2008 and rejected the argument of the plaintiffs. See below link:


Was Emmett Till's court case a supreme court case?

No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court


When the death penalty is imposed is the case automatically appealed to the highest appellate court within the juristiction?

yes


Can the US Supreme Court invoke the death penalty?

No. The US Supreme Court doesn't sentence defendants; the penalty phase of a trial is conducted by the original trial court.The Supreme Court may evaluate sentencing guidelines for constitutionality, which was the basis of the Court declaring a de facto moratorium on capital punishment in 1972. In the consolidated cases of Furman v. Georgia, 408 US 238 (1972), the Supreme Court held that death penalty sentencing guidelines were inconsistent across the United States, creating an infringement on the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. After the states and federal government applied safeguards against arbitrariness, the Court reversed its stance in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 US 153 (1976), holding the statutory revisions made use of the death penalty constitutional again.*They may also evaluate sentencing on an case-by-case basis, which is more common, if the question(s) the petitioner (plaintiff) raised on appeal allege the penalty somehow infringed his or her constitutional protections. The Court may decide a death penalty sentence has been misapplied, the jury was given incorrect instructions, or another matter relevant to the case was unconstitutional. In such a case, they would either vacate the sentence or reverse the judgment and remand (return) the case to a lower court for disposition. The lower court would have to resentence, grant a new trial, or release the defendant, in accordance with the justices' opinion.Absent a new trial, a defendant can't receive a more severe penalty than the judge or jury pronounced following the original conviction.The US Supreme Court never substitutes a new penalty of its own.* It is important to note that 15 states and the District of Columbia no longer use capital punishment. The federal government may prohibit use of capital punishment under the Constitution, but can not mandate its use. In states that abolished the death penalty, the state constitution and laws prevail.


Are all capital punishment trial bifurcated?

Yes. The United States Supreme Court case of Gregg v. Georgia in 1976 ruled that the death penalty is not cruel and unusual and creates a bifurcated death penalty trial system. The first trial is set up to find out if the defendant is guilty or innocent. In the second trial if found guilty the jury decides whether or not the defendant deserves the death penalty or not.


How does a case on appeal reach a supreme court?

A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court


In 1972 death penalty unconsitutional?

Yes, in 1972, the case of Furman v Georgia made the death penalty unconstitutional. By a vote of 5 to 4 the Supreme Court found the death penalty cruel and unusual as practiced. They said it was arbitrary and capricious in the way it was administered. Justices Marshall and Brennan found the death penalty cruel and unusual per se. Justice Douglas, Justice Stewart, and Justice White found capital punishment cruel and unusual as practiced. In 1976 Gregg v. Georgia brought back the death penalty.


How long does the death penalty last for a University?

The Death Penalty changes from case to case but is a minimum of 5 years