By being born to a parent who is legally resident of the US (either as citizen, permanent resident, student, or on a work visa).
Children born to diplomats are not eligible to receive citizenship by birth, under the laws of the US.
A person becomes a citizen through jus sanguinis by having parents who are citizen of that country. It means right by blood.
By being born in the United States.
Not sure what you are asking, but a person born in the United States is a citizen.
On account his race. The Court declared that a black person could not be a citizen of anywhere.
Not sure what you are asking, but a person born in the United States is a citizen.
Not in most cases. If both parents are Americans, the case has not been positively settled in the courts. As a rule, the President must be a native born citizen.
It is a rule stating that if you are married to an US citizen then you will be considered an legal citizen.
Anyone can become an Israeli citizen except for an ethnic Palestinian who did not live within the Israeli borders in 1949 or is not in the annexed territories (like the Golan or East Jerusalem). This caveat is due to the sensitive political nature of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. In fact, Palestinians are the single largest Israeli citizen group after Jews. It is far easier for a Jew to become an Israeli citizen, than a non-Jew, but this is typical of countries in the region which give individuals of the dominant ethnicity from abroad to become citizens. (Armenia, Lithuania, Poland, etc. have this rule as well.) There is criticism that the inequality of citizenship process times is problematic, but it is much easier for a Muslim or Christian from abroad to become an Israeli citizen than it is for a Jew or Christian from abroad to become a Moroccan or Tunisian citizen and a non-Muslim can never become a Saudi citizen.
Anyone can become an Israeli citizen except for an ethnic Palestinian who did not live within the Israeli borders in 1949 or is not in the annexed territories (like the Golan or East Jerusalem). This caveat is due to the sensitive political nature of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. In fact, Palestinians are the single largest Israeli citizen group after Jews. It is far easier for a Jew to become an Israeli citizen, than a non-Jew, but this is typical of countries in the region which give individuals of the dominant ethnicity from abroad to become citizens. (Armenia, Lithuania, Poland, etc. have this rule as well.) There is criticism that the inequality of citizenship process times is problematic, but it is much easier for a Muslim or Christian from abroad to become an Israeli citizen than it is for a Jew or Christian from abroad to become a Moroccan or Tunisian citizen and a non-Muslim can never become a Saudi citizen.
just follow the Islamic rule because a good Muslim is good citizen.....
If both of the parents are Chinese, a person born in China will be Chinese. However, there are many exceptions to this. If the parents, or at least one of the parents, is a US citizen, they child can be a US Citizen. Many other countries have the same rule.
Direct democracy is distinguished by allowing citizens to participate directly in decision-making processes rather than through elected representatives. This form of democracy typically involves frequent referendums, initiatives, and town hall meetings where individuals have a direct say in shaping policies and laws. It promotes greater citizen engagement and emphasizes the importance of individual voices in governance.
To me, and this is not a complete list, but being a good Australian citizen means working hard, obeying the rule of law, participating in the political process, respecting the rights and opinions of others and looking out for your mates. I don't believe that any of these contradict what is also required to be a good Muslim. That being the case, I can't see why a person cannot be both a good Muslim and a good Australian citizen. Islam is not my religion, but as a good Australian citizen, I must (and I do) respect and support the right of Muslims to practice their religion... and I welcome them as fellow Australian citizens.
The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.The republic, where each citizen had a vote to choose who would rule them.