Well niw, let's think about it. Lots of people (we hope) buy tickets for the performance. The theatre, stadium etc costs money, but some is left over for the artist.
Bands certainly make more money from concerts. Most major label contracts only pay a small fraction of each CD, and there are many reductions taken from the artist's royalties. So unless your CD sells millions of units, you're not going to make much. For live performances, however, the artist keeps most of the money. Basically this can be extended to the debate about pirating digital music: it's not going to kill the artist, it's only killing the record companies.
Nothing, it is the sales of the single that make the money not the act of recording. If the single is rubbish then nobody will purchase it and the artist will make no money.
Make an auction and find out
250,000 a year
alot
Hell yeah
They both help the bands make money along side selling their music, and the experience to individuals is wonderful. Seeing your favorite artist live, dancing, and getting to hear them in all their glory is spectacular. Clearly, you have not seen your favorite artist live.
They can make anywhere from hundreds to thousands, from thousands to millions, depending on how good is the artist.
120,0000 (12 lacks)
They make $1.5 million a year.
It depands on how much of the video is sold
Over a million