For an Atheist, it's simple: Evolutionary scientific theory has mountians of testible evidence and Design theory has no testible evidence or proof, just conjecture and usually unfounded conclusions that require "faith" (belief in a system without, or in contrary to, evidence). Keep in mind that scientific theory and the common useage of the word "theory" have two different definitions.
Ir is an argument, not a theory. Claims the living world is too complex to have been evolved. Generally used by people totally ignorant of evolutionary processes and has no supporting evidence.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
Evolutionary theory responds to the argument from design for the existence of God by demonstrating that complex biological structures can emerge through natural selection and random mutation, without the need for a designer. It provides a natural explanation for the diversity and complexity of life on Earth, which does not require the intervention of a supernatural being.
Nonsense.
The design argument, also known as the teleological argument, is an argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the complexity and order in the natural world indicate the existence of a designer. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe point towards an intelligent creator.
Aquinas's design argument is a philosophical argument that asserts the existence of God based on observations of the order and purpose evident in the natural world. According to Aquinas, the complexity and harmony in nature suggest a design by an intelligent creator, which he identifies as God. The argument is also known as the teleological argument, derived from the Greek word "telos," meaning purpose or end.
it seeks to offer an explanation for the design within the universe
Evolutionary adaptations cannot be predicted. Flora and fauna adapt to changing circumstances and environments by chance, not by design.
The argument by design, also known as the teleological argument, posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest the presence of an intelligent designer. It argues that the intricate design and purpose in nature imply the existence of a creator or higher power. This argument is often used to support the existence of God or some form of intelligent being behind the universe.
Visual Rhetoric
The design argument, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest a designer, is convincing to some people because it provides a logical explanation for the existence of complex systems. However, others find it unconvincing due to alternative explanations, like natural selection, and the lack of direct evidence for a designer. Ultimately, the persuasiveness of the design argument can vary depending on an individual's perspective and beliefs.
Answer 1I'm pretty sure he is a Christian. However, he supports evolution, and not intelligent design.