answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Among other things, our GPS systems, defense systems and communications networks would not work properly if we did not know how to adjust for relativistic effects as predicted by Einstein's equations. Relativity has been verified in a number of ways and has not yet been refuted, so relativity has helped shape and direct a great deal of subsequent research. Relativity is also helping us, little by little, come to better cosmological concepts.

Disagreement:

(1) Apparently our GPS systems do not use Special Relativity, although that fact is hidden in the math. See:

3. Wang, Ruyong. Successful GPS Operations Contradict the Two Principles of Special Relativity and Imply a New Way for Inertial Navigation - Measuring Speed Directly. Proceeding of the IAIN World Congress in association with the U.S. ION Annual Meeting, 26-28 June 2000, San Diego, CA.

(2) Einstein created a very complete and complicated theory of Special Relativity. Beckmann realized that a simpler system could work, and he favored gravity as the "aether" for light. I think, however, that the electromagnetic fields that exist (everywhere) can "carry" the electromagnetic "waves" (i.e., light). I am not allowed to show you the link. It is amazing how far afield we can drift.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The main disadvantage of the Big Bang theory probably lies in our inability to explain where the original "ball" of energy came from that did the expanding (the "Bang") to form the universe and the spacetime that it occupies. Note, if you please, that the universe did not expand into an "empty" universe or volume of space, but involved all the energy that "condensed" and the creation of spacetime in which to exist.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The temperature of the CMB was one of the predictions following from the Big Bang model. Finding that the actual temperature was a close match to the prediction was an important confirmation of accuracy of the model.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence for an evolutionary expansion of the universe and rationalization for a finite age of the universe. The Big Bang implies that the universe is Time bound (or has a finite existence), that the universe is expanding (within the dimensional limits of Space and Time), that the universe is evolving a set amount of matter and energy while it is expanding over time, and that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic with respect to Space and Time.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Before the CMBR was ever observed, it followed from the Big Bang theory that the CMBR should have a particular temperature, and that the variations in the background should have a particular distribution and range of sizes. The CMBR, when it was detected, matched those predictions very closely.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The Big Bang Theory present the theoretical premise for the causation, termination, and continuation of an evolutionary expansion of the universe. The Big Bang Theory promotes four concepts for consideration:

1. that the observable universe is Time bound (or has a finite existence)

2. that the observable universe is expanding (within the dimensional limits of Space and Time),

3. that the observable universe is evolving a set amount of matter and energy while it is expanding over time, and

4. that the observable universe is homogeneous and isotropic with respect to Space and Time.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The Big Bang theory proposes that the Universe began in a microscopic super-dense, super-hot state, which expanded to become the Universe we see today.

This early state implies that the Universe should be full of radiation created in that fireball; as the Universe expanded, that radiation cooled, and should now be perfect blackbody radiation at a temperature of around 3 degrees Kelvin. (Actually, the original temperature prediction was higher, but that was before the exact age of the Universe was known, and was also subject to some other technical modifications that reduced the original prediction.)

When the cosmic background radiation was discovered, it fit these predictions perfectly, which gives a fair amount of evidence that there is some truth behind the theory. Attempts to explain the cosmic background radiation were made in the context of the Big Bang's chief competitor, the Steady State theory, but proved to be unsatisfactory.

So the cosmic background radiation supports the Big Bang Theory because the theory predicted its existence, its temperature, and its form.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Because everywhere we look in the night sky there is heat. If the big bang did not occur then technically areas where there is not any stars should have no heat. But this is not the case, the average temperature of the universe is about 2 kelvin. This is due to the fact that the big bang left behind heat that is currently being dissipated through the expansion of the universe. The temperature will keep going down but will never actually reach 0 degrees kelvin.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

we all need an answer and this hypothesis is the best theory that mankind knows. It developed to reflect observation of data, and in fact is now considered overwhelmingly accurate back to several milliseconds after the actual Bang.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Even the experts don't know that. Of course, they have some theories, but nobody really knows.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does background radiation support ''the big bang theory''?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which theory of the universe did the 1964 discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation support?

I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.


Why did the discovery of background radiation with a wavelength of 7.35 cm help to support the big bang theory of the universe?

I am not entirely sure about the wavelength; however, the features of the background radiation agree very closely to what would be expected from the Big Bang theory.


What scientists use to support the big bang theory?

The Doppler effect and background cosmic radiation are the big ones.


Why did the discovery of cosmic background radiation with a wavelength of 7.35 cm help support the big bang theory?

Note that it also helped support the theory of inflation. The reason is that the observed radiation very closely matched what was expected from the theory.


What theory predicted the cosmic background radiation?

The Big Bang.


What are the 2 terms to support the big bang theory?

1) Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation 2) The universe is very quickly expanding


Background radiation detected in space is believed to be evidence that?

the big bang occured


Which of these is evidence that supports the big bang theory?

cosmic microwave background radiation


Which theory is supported by the evidence of cosmic microwave backround radiation?

The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.


What evidence was used to develop the big bang theory?

The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.


What kind of radition helped prove the big bang theory to scientists?

Cosmic background radiation.


Does the cosmic background radiation support the big bang theory in 1965?

The big bang theory is a useful and effective explanation for the cosmic microwave background, as well as for a number of other observations. Theories are proposed to explain observations. Real scientists don't pull theories out of the air and then go looking for ways to support them. That's not how science works.