Democracy grows and flourishes in diverse opinion. The whole point of freedom of the press and freedom of religion is that views can be tested and measured faithfully against one another. Everyone has bias, that can't be avoided by using other systems of governing. In a democracy those biases can't become public policy unless there is more than bias behind them.
Citizens disagreeing is not necessarily a 'problem' in a democracy: it is the basis and essence of a democracy to entertain all views. The assumption is that these disagreements are civil and are subjects for discussion. However, when citizens in disagreement resort to violence or prejudice and the disagreements take action over dialog, then the result can be a problem for any democracy.
The democracy of the US depends on the participation of its citizens because it is tailored to be a representative democracy. Citizens need to be involved by voting in representatives who represent their views.
Aristotle describes democracy as a form of government where power is held by the majority of the people, who participate in decision-making through voting and elections. He views democracy as a rule by the people, emphasizing the importance of political participation and equality among citizens.
Without it, politcal leaders have no way of representing the people's views.
In a direct (or radical)l democracy the citizens met in regular assembly, considering and deciding on all matters of government. A Council implements these decisions. This is far more democratic than today's indirect (representative) democracy where elected representatives form a parliament and vote how they or their party want, not necessarily the way their electors want. The US has a representative democracy - that is the citizens elect representatives to Congress who are supposed to represent their views.
They're Biased towards the LNP
In a research paper you may need to discuss other views, including biased opinions. These should be discussed as such.
LiberalismCommunism
his views on government were slavery, and democracy and also i believe the army
citizens
The three pillars of democracy in ancient Athens were participation, equality, and freedom. Participation involved the active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes, primarily through assemblies and councils. Equality, or "isonomia," ensured that all citizens had equal rights and opportunities to engage in politics, regardless of social status. Freedom emphasized individual liberties, allowing citizens to express their views and vote without coercion.
i am favour of democracy because it gives freedom one can express his or her views strongly..