well i care
Evolution--basically anything that is "change over time" in the terms you are thinking is evolution.
I understand that he did not believe in God/Jesus even thought he was Jewish. I do not recall reading anything about is beliefs on evolution. Does someone have the answer to this question? Thanks
The idea of evolution is that evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution by natural selection explains much about the fact of evolution. Your question is ill posed. A more modern phrase would say your question is malformed. How could the fact of evolution be a threat to anything? How could the theory that is the backbone of biology not be one of the greatest progressions in science? Much confusion between fact and theory. Theory explains fact and encompasses fact and is a higher scientific concept than fact.
He didn't believe anything about it. Ussher was an archbishop of the Church of Ireland, living at a time when nothing was known about evolution. He was a classic Young Earth creationist; he's even known for calculating the date of creation based on scripture, but had he known about evolution and the evidence for common descent, there's no telling how he would have reacted.
You can doubt evolution and anything else you want. The better question is if you should doubt evolution, or if you can reasonably doubt evolution in light of science. A lot of aspects concerning evolution are backed by rather sound science. That isn't to say that the theory of evolution explains everything. The earliest textbooks on the topic said that you had to take parts of it by faith. That is no different than believing what religion has to say about it. You do have to ask yourself how to reconcile the laws saying that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed with the Big Bang Theory. Since if there was nothing, then you must ask where all the "something" suddenly come from.
He invented the Theory of Evolution.
Evolution--basically anything that is "change over time" in the terms you are thinking is evolution.
Floatzel is the final evolution of Buizel. It does not evolve into anything.
Bronzong is the highest evolution. It doesn't evolve into anything.
All animals are eukaryotes. In fact, anything within the domain Eukaryota is a eukaryote. This includes animals, plants, fungi, and others. Biology classifies everything into two domains: one for eukaryotes and one for prokaryotes. Prokaryotes are almost exclusively unicellular, although it is believed there are some multicellular prokaryotes. Eukaryotes can be either unicellular or multicellular.Answer is Yes, obviously.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
Nope so far lapras has no preevolution nor a evolution.
I understand that he did not believe in God/Jesus even thought he was Jewish. I do not recall reading anything about is beliefs on evolution. Does someone have the answer to this question? Thanks
I answered a question like this earlier. It does not. What flood myth? There are many of them and none of them have anything to do with the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Pachirisu does not evolve from anything and does not evolve into anything. No evolution forms. I kept leveling one of mine up but when nothing came to it I found out on the website.
Bible is not empirical thus anything conceived within its story cannot be perceived as scientific evidence. For anything.
Onix doesn't evolve from anything. It evolves into Steelix, but Onix is the base pokemon for that evolution chain. :)