0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does intelligent design challenge the theory of evolution?
No. Intelligent Design is not a viable theory since it does not explain all of the steps nor provide any evidence to substantiate its claims. As a result, the Theory of Evolution remains unchallenged by it.
Is there a credible scientific theory that opposes evolution?
The argument against the theory of evolution is Creation ex-nihilo ['out of nothing'] by God, sometimes called the Intelligent Design, or ID, theory. = =
What are the differences and similarities between creationism intelligent design and evolution?
The first two say "gee - it's so complicated somebody must have planed it" along with the extra ego trip that says that we're pretty special. Evolution says that one single rule can generate complexity from simplicity. (The rule is let the weak weed themselves out - we call it death.) Forget the God argument ... He could have invented evolution too. In fact, it would take a superior sort of entity to do do so.
Why do some believe creationists are so dumb?
Because every argument they make in support of creationism / denial of evolution is demonstrably false.
What are the evidence presented in court for Charles Darwin theory of intelligent design?
Not sure how to answer this as scientific theories are not subject to the law but are supported by overwhelming evidence. The only time that evolution or the theory that supports it is in a court of law is when some public school somewhere, or some state somewhere tries to introduce religion into the classroom disguised inder the terms creation " science : or intelligent design.There is no theory of evolution put forward by Charles Darwin that includes intelligent design. If fact the theory of evolution by natural selection is the antithesis of intelligent design.
What are Arguments against intelligent design behind evolution?
Every argument against evolution falls into several categories. 1.) It could disprove something if it were true, but that something would not be evolution. 2.) There are no arguments for Intelligent design, all they have are arguments against evolution (and sometime plate tectonics, cosmology, mathematics's, or oceanography). 3.) Every single argument made against evolution or any other natural science in defence of intelligent design (also known as creationism as determined by a conservative Christian judge) has been used as an argument against intelligent design and backing up the science that the creationists are trying to ignore. Summary: Take any creationist claim, summarize it, and take the reverse of that and you get the scientific arguments against intelligent design and for evolution.
Does intelligent design challenge the theory of evolution?
No. Intelligent Design is not a viable theory since it does not explain all of the steps nor provide any evidence to substantiate its claims. As a result, the Theory of Evolution remains unchallenged by it.
Is there a credible scientific theory that opposes evolution?
The argument against the theory of evolution is Creation ex-nihilo ['out of nothing'] by God, sometimes called the Intelligent Design, or ID, theory. = =
What is an argument from design?
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
Why do Darwin and evolution weaken the design argument?
Strictly speaking, this question is in the wrong order, because Charles Darwin and evolution pre-dated the intelligent design argument.At the time of Charles Darwin, in the nineteenth century, most people in Europe and the Americas believed that God created all living things just as we see them now. Thus, there was no reason for the intelligent design argument, which holds that if evolution occurred then it must have been guided by an unseen deity.Intelligent design is in part a political phenomenon, created in the United States because the Courts rejected the teaching of creationism, and then 'creation science', as science in the school syllabus. The proponents of intelligent design believed that, by separating claims for the existence of God from their hypothesis about design of living organisms, the courts would accept intelligent design as a suitable topic for a science course, taught alongside, or instead of, evolution. However, this was as weak an argument as those previously submitted for creationism and creation science, and intelligent design continues to be regarded as a religious argument, not a scientific one.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is argument from design?
Nonsense.
What does design argument mean?
The design argument, also known as the teleological argument, is an argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the complexity and order in the natural world indicate the existence of a designer. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe point towards an intelligent creator.
What is a design challenge?
y AN OPPORTUNITY TO FLEX YOUR DESIGN SKILLS AND CREATE DESIGN
What was the last scientific theory to challenge the theory of evolution?
No scientific theory ever challenged the theory of evolution.
Why do atheists reject the design argument?
Primarily, the "design" argument is religious-faith-based construct and simply a new name for creationism. Atheists simply do not accept religious-faith-based arguments to explain the natural world. Atheists tend to reject the design argument mainly because of our current knowledge of the theory of evolution. The vast majority of natural things which appear designed, such as wings, have been shown to be the process of evolution by natural selection. There remain some things which appear designed that haven't yet been explained by evolutionary theory, but atheists typically argue that these are minor, and will be explained eventually since there is abundant evidence that supports evolution and it can be reproduced in the laboratory. Another common line of argument is that the few things we cannot currently explain by evolution may never be explained, and for the time being it is better to say "we do not know" than "this means God did it". Scientific research is an ongoing process. For an interesting and comprehensive discussion of 'intelligent design aka creationism" see the link provided below for the decision in Kitzmiller vs Dover.
What is aquina's design argument?
Aquinas's design argument is a philosophical argument that asserts the existence of God based on observations of the order and purpose evident in the natural world. According to Aquinas, the complexity and harmony in nature suggest a design by an intelligent creator, which he identifies as God. The argument is also known as the teleological argument, derived from the Greek word "telos," meaning purpose or end.
What are the key ideas of the design argument?
it seeks to offer an explanation for the design within the universe
