Nuclear fusion is not a practical source of energy yet, though it may be in the distant future
Nuclear fusion is mainly used in the US for research purposes, with several projects working towards developing fusion as a viable energy source. Projects like ITER aim to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power. However, commercial fusion power plants are not yet operational in the US.
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.
I currently use nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion does not currently occur in nuclear plants. Nuclear plants use nuclear fission, where atoms are split to release energy. Fusion reactions, in which atomic nuclei combine to release energy, are not yet used commercially for electricity generation.
No, a nuclear power plant producing electricity is an example of nuclear fission, not fusion. In nuclear fission, the nucleus of an atom is split, releasing energy, whereas in nuclear fusion, atomic nuclei combine to release energy.
from cancer? no
The nuclear fusion is not used now as a source of energy; probable possible in a far future.
Nuclear fusion is mainly used in the US for research purposes, with several projects working towards developing fusion as a viable energy source. Projects like ITER aim to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power. However, commercial fusion power plants are not yet operational in the US.
Today nuclear fusion is not controlled at industry scale.
Nuclear Fusion
Fusion is a nuclear reaction.
The key difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion is the process by which they release energy. Nuclear fission involves splitting a heavy nucleus into smaller nuclei, while nuclear fusion involves combining light nuclei to form a heavier nucleus.
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
0% No country gets any of its energy from fusion as nobody has figured out how to build a controlled fusion reactor.
Nuclear fusion
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.
In nuclear fusion mass transforms into energy.