0
The term 'minerals' can be rock minerals, or coal or gas or oil. All of these are found on all the present continents which were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea. The name Pangaea is from the Greek word for'all earth' and the term 'earth' in The Bible is used for the land masses.
Pangaea was originally a small moon like body that was formed at the same time as all the planets were formed and in my book 'The Firmament of the sky dome' I have used the term Esther for this small moon which joined up with the Earth soon after the Earth had obtained its very deep global ocean. When Esther did join up with the Earth her contents spread out and it is this spreading out that formed the near circular supercontinent Pangaea. When this happened is very difficult to say but if we go by the Geological Column then it is clear that Pangaea supported several generations of life before this generation which began some 10,000 years ago according to the Bible.
We also know from the Bible that Pangaea split up into continents only about 4000 years ago and for this reason it is still possible to fit the continents together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Had the split up occurred more than say 20 million years ago the continents would have either been completely eroded away or reformed onto new shapes that would not fit together.
In my opinion the split up occurred because the supercontinent was formed on a very wet slippery surface to begin with so sliding occurred when the earth briefly lost its near spherical shape as a result of pressures from under the basaltic lithosphere on which the supercontinent was formed. My book explains this s some detail. In simple terms the continents simply slid downhill powered by their own gravity. The soft layer under the lithosphere does not have the ability to move the foundations as they are very thick and interlocked at plate boundaries.
There is no evidence in my opinion that the continents moved away from each other extremely slowly and hundreds of millions of years ago. If anyone can provide me with this I will be most interested. Earthquakes occur because individual plates can rise and fall under pressure from below and for this reason earthquakes are mainly confined to plate boundaries.
The basaltic lithosphere was split into plates partly when Esther crash landed and afterwards as a result of the heat constantly being generated in the Upper Mantle by decay of radioactive elements.
I hope the above answers all the several questions raised on this topic
What else can I help you with?
What scientific evidence supports the theory of Pangaea?
Scientific evidence supporting the theory of Pangaea includes the fit of the continents' coastlines, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence of ancient plants and animals. Additionally, the distribution of certain species among continents and the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and plate tectonics further support the concept of Pangaea.
Evidence that proves Pangaea didnt exist?
Evidence that Pangaea didn't exist includes the lack of a continuous geological feature from that time period, the differing mineral compositions and ages of rocks on different continents, and the shifting magnetic pole positions recorded in rocks worldwide that don't align with a single supercontinent. Additionally, the distribution of plant and animal fossils doesn't support the idea of a single, unified landmass during the time of Pangaea.
What evidence that supports the existence of pangaea?
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
How do plate boundaries support the theory of Pangaea?
Plate boundaries support the theory of Pangaea by showing how continents fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This alignment of continents along plate boundaries provides evidence that they were once connected and have since drifted apart due to plate tectonics. The movement of plates at these boundaries helps explain how Pangaea split into the continents we see today.
What forms of evidence were used to help gather evidence for the existence of pangaea?
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
What scientific evidence supports the theory of Pangaea?
Scientific evidence supporting the theory of Pangaea includes the fit of the continents' coastlines, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence of ancient plants and animals. Additionally, the distribution of certain species among continents and the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and plate tectonics further support the concept of Pangaea.
What evidence did Alfred wegener use to support his theory of the breakup of Pangaea?
Alfred Wegener used evidence such as the apparent fit of the continents, similarities in rock formations and mountain ranges across continents, and the distribution of fossils of identical species in continents that are now separated by vast oceans to support his theory of the breakup of Pangaea. He also cited geological and paleontological evidence from different continents that suggested they were once connected.
Evidence that proves Pangaea didnt exist?
Evidence that Pangaea didn't exist includes the lack of a continuous geological feature from that time period, the differing mineral compositions and ages of rocks on different continents, and the shifting magnetic pole positions recorded in rocks worldwide that don't align with a single supercontinent. Additionally, the distribution of plant and animal fossils doesn't support the idea of a single, unified landmass during the time of Pangaea.
What evidence that supports the existence of pangaea?
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
What is the climatological evidence for Pangaea's existence?
Egghead Egghead
How do plate boundaries support the theory of Pangaea?
Plate boundaries support the theory of Pangaea by showing how continents fit together like a jigsaw puzzle. This alignment of continents along plate boundaries provides evidence that they were once connected and have since drifted apart due to plate tectonics. The movement of plates at these boundaries helps explain how Pangaea split into the continents we see today.
What are pieces of evidence that support the idea of Pangaea?
Pieces of evidence supporting the idea of Pangaea include matching geological formations and fossils across continents, such as the Appalachian Mountains in the eastern U.S. aligning with Scotland's Caledonian Mountains. Additionally, the fit of modern-day continents like South America and Africa along their coastlines and similarities in rock types and ages found on different continents further support the theory of Pangaea. Evidence from paleoclimate studies, like glacial deposits in tropical regions, also contributes to the theory.
What evidence proves that Pangaea once existed?
Evidence to support the theory of Pangaea includes the fit of continents like South America and Africa, the distribution of similar fossils and rock formations across continents, and matching mountain ranges and geological structures on different landmasses. Furthermore, the study of plate tectonics has provided additional evidence by explaining how continents have moved over time.
What evidence can be provided to support the claim that Pangaea did not exist?
The evidence that supports the claim that Pangaea did not exist includes the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and the movement of tectonic plates. Fossils of similar species found on different continents suggest that they were once connected. Additionally, the alignment of rock formations and the movement of tectonic plates provide further evidence that the continents were not always together as one supercontinent.
What rock types support the therory of pangaea?
The distribution of similar rock types across continents that were once part of Pangaea, such as the Appalachian mountains in North America aligning with the Caledonian mountains in Europe and North Africa, supports the theory of Pangaea. Additionally, identical fossils, coal deposits, and rock formations found on different continents provide further evidence for the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
