0
Scientific evidence supporting the theory of Pangaea includes the fit of the continents' Coastlines, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence of ancient plants and animals. Additionally, the distribution of certain species among continents and the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and plate tectonics further support the concept of Pangaea.
What else can I help you with?
Is Pangaea theory true?
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
What evidence that supports the existence of pangaea?
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
How do scientists know Pangaea was together?
Scientists know Pangaea was once together because of several lines of evidence, including matching rock formations and fossils across continents, as well as the fit of the continents' coastlines like puzzle pieces. Additionally, evidence from plate tectonics theory, such as the movement of continents over time and the presence of mid-ocean ridges, supports the idea of Pangaea's existence.
What rock types support the therory of pangaea?
The distribution of similar rock types across continents that were once part of Pangaea, such as the Appalachian mountains in North America aligning with the Caledonian mountains in Europe and North Africa, supports the theory of Pangaea. Additionally, identical fossils, coal deposits, and rock formations found on different continents provide further evidence for the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
Why did most scientists not believe in Pangaea?
Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.
Why is the existence of Pangaea a belief rather than a fact?
The existence of Pangaea is a scientific theory supported by evidence such as the fit of the continents, geological similarities, and fossil distributions. While overwhelming evidence supports the theory, it is still technically a hypothesis because we cannot directly observe the movement of the continents over millions of years.
What is scientific evidence appeal?
Scientific evidence appeal is some form of proof which supports or counters a scientific theory. This is the information that will be used as empirical evidence of a hypothesis.
Most of the scientific evidence available today supports the?
the big bang theory
What forms of evidence were used to help gather evidence for the existence of pangaea?
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
Can a theory be rejected?
Yes, a scientific theory can be rejected if new evidence or observations contradict its predictions or if a more accurate theory is developed. The rejection of a theory is an essential part of the scientific process that helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
Why do people preach evolution when it is just a theory?
Because non-scientists do not understand what a scientific theory actually means. It is not a random guess. Scientific theories are formed based on evidence and experimentation.The scientific community advocates evolution because all the evidence of life on our planet supports the theory.
Does evidence prove or disprove evolution?
Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence. The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory. PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
Is Pangaea theory true?
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
What evidence that supports the existence of pangaea?
There definitively was a Pangaea. Pangaea implies one continent. Back when the earth was forming, there was no oceans, thus the whole earth would be referred to as Pangaea. Today continents would refer to how much land is above the ocean.
What is the 2 most important words in science?
Evidence and theory. Evidence supports or refutes a scientific claim, while theory explains the underlying principles and mechanisms behind observed phenomena. Both are crucial for understanding the natural world and advancing scientific knowledge.
How do scientists know Pangaea was together?
Scientists know Pangaea was once together because of several lines of evidence, including matching rock formations and fossils across continents, as well as the fit of the continents' coastlines like puzzle pieces. Additionally, evidence from plate tectonics theory, such as the movement of continents over time and the presence of mid-ocean ridges, supports the idea of Pangaea's existence.
What rock types support the therory of pangaea?
The distribution of similar rock types across continents that were once part of Pangaea, such as the Appalachian mountains in North America aligning with the Caledonian mountains in Europe and North Africa, supports the theory of Pangaea. Additionally, identical fossils, coal deposits, and rock formations found on different continents provide further evidence for the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
