Law and math prove things. Science supports tentative ( more or less ) explanations of natural phenomenon with evidence.
The evidence overwhelmingly supports evolutionary theory.
PS Evolution itself is a observed and observable fact.
There are no scientific theories that disprove evolution. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields. Any claims to the contrary are not supported by scientific consensus.
To disprove evolution, one would need to provide scientifically-backed evidence that cannot be explained by evolutionary theory, such as finding a fossil in a rock layer that it should not be in based on the geological timescale, or demonstrating a complex biological structure that could not have evolved through gradual processes. However, the overwhelming evidence from multiple scientific fields strongly supports the theory of evolution.
There is no single piece of evidence that definitively disproves evolution. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Any challenges to the theory of evolution would need to provide substantial evidence and be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Find some fully formed elephant fossils in Cambrian rock. Find ANY modern animal before it's evolutionary ancestors in the geologic column. Evolution would be unable to explain this.AnswerGOOD LUCK
That which does not provide evidence for evolution is not necessarily something that tends to disprove evolution. So it is hard to narrow down to something relevant but does not provide evidence for evolution. As for something that actually tends to disprove evolution, this is equally hard but for different reasons - the evidence for evolution is so overwhelming that there is very little that can provide any form of contrary evidence.
Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
Yes, it does.
Scientific evidence is facts or evidence that is used to prove or disprove a scientific theory. Scientific evidence appeal is when new finding or statistics are brought to light that disprove some or all of the previous evidence's findings.
The opposite of "prove" is "disprove." While to prove something means to establish its truth or validity through evidence or argument, to disprove means to demonstrate that something is false or invalid. Another related term could be "refute," which involves providing counterarguments or evidence that contradicts a claim.
A theory.
There are no scientific theories that disprove evolution. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields. Any claims to the contrary are not supported by scientific consensus.
AnswerThe science of biology, including the Theory of Evolution, is only concerned with the natural world. It is not concerned with the existence of gods, angels or ghosts, and neither seeks to prove nor disprove the presence of paranormal phenomena.
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
The opposite of "prove" with a prefix is "disprove." It means to show that something is false or incorrect through evidence or reasoning.
the tendency of a given item of evidence to prove or disprove one of the legal elements of the case
Disprove.