The preponderance of physical evidence supports the concept that all the continents were once united in a single land mass. This makes Pangaea more of a fact than a belief.
Truth or reality as distinct from mere statement or belief
There is no scientific evidence or credible historical records to support the existence of literal giants walking the earth. Mythological and folklore accounts of giants are common in various cultures, but they are considered to be legends rather than historical fact.
They have evidence, but if they cant prove something, even with the evidence, it becomes a theroy, or belief. So sometimes it is based on evidence and fact, sometimes on belief.
If something is not a fact, it means that it cannot be proven to be true based on evidence or logic. It may be an opinion, belief, or speculation.
The noun 'fact' is a singular, common, abstract noun; a word for an idea or belief.
It is not a belief but is a fact. At one time all of the land mass of the world was one.
Doesn't have to be. Fact is something that can be tested and confirmed. A belief is a hunch, an idea, a theory. The existence of the Moon is a fact. The existence of angels is a belief.
When the fact the pangaea was discovered became known.
There is no definitive evidence to suggest the existence of aliens, so it is unclear if they are alive or dead. It is a topic of speculation and belief rather than scientific fact at this point.
A prejudice is a belief about someone or something that is unfounded. Prejudices are based on preconceived notions or stereotypes, rather than fact or experience.
Yes, a statement can be considered an opinion if it expresses a personal belief or viewpoint rather than a fact that can be proven.
She believes in the existence of God. The existence of gravity is a fact.
Pangaea
a priori
Words like "I believe," "I think," "in my opinion," "probably," and "likely" typically indicate that a statement is an opinion rather than a fact. These words signal that the statement is based on personal interpretation or belief rather than objective evidence.
Where did you get that idea? The existence of George Washington is a proven fact from seventeen directions west of Tuesday. It is not a "theory".
The existence of giraffes is a scientific fact, not a matter of belief. They are real animals that can be observed and studied in the wild and in captivity. Saying "I don't believe in giraffes" would be denying their existence, which goes against the evidence that supports their presence in the natural world.