0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between naturalism and non-naturalism?
Naturalism is the philosophical belief that all phenomena can be explained by natural causes without recourse to supernatural or divine intervention, while non-naturalism allows for the possibility of supernatural or non-natural explanations for certain phenomena. Naturalism tends to prioritize empirical evidence and scientific explanations, whereas non-naturalism may incorporate metaphysical or spiritual elements.
Do evolutionists believe in global warming?
Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.
What is the difference between scientific explanations and supernatural explanations?
Scientific explanations should not be given unless it has been proved by experiment and testing that they are accurate and reliable. Supernatural explanations can be given by anybody anywhere, whether they know anything about the subject or not. More deeply, this question is really about a much bigger question, "Is there a supernatural?" The adjective "supernatural", usually refers to events and ideas which belong in the spiritual world. The spiritual world is usually described as a copy of the natural world. The difference is that in the spiritual world, the rules which cover what can and cannot be done in the natural world, do not apply. For example, spirits are people who may have existed in the natural world, but have left their dead bodies in the real world and have escaped to the spiritual world. There are many interpretations of this notion. Some imagine that these spirits have spiritual bodies which are copies of natural bodies, but without natural substance. Interpretations vary wildly. Some people believe that spiritual bodies need spiritual houses to live in, and cannot walk through the walls. Others suppose that spirits have no bodies at all - no eyes, no legs, no brain and nothing but a consciousness by which they can observe, think and do things in an unexplainable manner to unexplainable subjects. Supernatural explanations are most often used to explain things for one of two reasons. The first is that things which cannot be explained by scientists seem to defy the rules of science. Jesus turned water into wine, but to do that today we would need a very powerful nuclear reactor which could fuse hydrogen and oxygen atoms into carbon atoms - and that would be just a start. Nitrogen and phosphorus are also necessary to produce the organic matter which makes up the organic material in wine. Obviously, those things weren't known in Jesus's time and there were certainly no nuclear power stations. Therefore a spiritual explanation for how he did it is needed. The laws of science have to be bypassed. So, scientists know how we could turn water into wine, but they also know that we can't do it with the equipment we have. That is the scientific explanation. The spiritual explanation is simply that in the supernatural world there are no limitations on what can be done. The second use for supernatural explanations usually involves relations between people. If we accept that there is a supernatural part of all living people, then the things they do may not be due to their natural part, but due to their spirit. In that way, the strange things people do can be simply explained by our lack of understanding their spiritual desires.
What two things are in involved in faith?
Belief in something without proof or evidence, and trust or confidence in that belief despite uncertainty or doubt.
What is the cotribution of revelation in natural science?
Revelation is typically not considered a primary source of information in natural science, as this field relies on empirical evidence and reasoning to understand the natural world. While some individuals may find personal inspiration or guidance from their beliefs in revelation, it is not a method used to generate scientific knowledge or discoveries in the natural sciences.
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
What was the belief shared by scientists and philosophers of the scientific revolution?
One belief shared by scientists and philosophers of the Scientific Revolution was the importance of observation and experimentation to understand the natural world. They rejected traditional beliefs based solely on authority and emphasized the need for empirical evidence to support theories and hypotheses. This shift in thinking laid the foundation for modern scientific methodology.
What reasons might there be for the universal belief among scientists that there are only two kinds of electric charge?
That's not just a "belief", that's what has been observed.
Tell you the difference between a principle and a theory?
A principle is a fundamental truth or belief that serves as the basis for a system of thought or behavior. A theory, on the other hand, is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and can be tested and verified through observation and experimentation. In essence, principles are foundational concepts, while theories are explanations supported by evidence.
What is the difference between naturalism and non-naturalism?
Naturalism is the philosophical belief that all phenomena can be explained by natural causes without recourse to supernatural or divine intervention, while non-naturalism allows for the possibility of supernatural or non-natural explanations for certain phenomena. Naturalism tends to prioritize empirical evidence and scientific explanations, whereas non-naturalism may incorporate metaphysical or spiritual elements.
Do evolutionists believe in global warming?
Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.
Is there any evidence of the divinity on earth?
No. You may believe the existence of everything natural is by some sort of divine power but belief - including statements of authors' belief expressed in scriptures like the Bible - is not proof.
A supposition that some mix of common sense and scientific inquiry will always lead to a conclusion that is true typifies what?
This belief aligns with the principle of methodological naturalism, which asserts that the scientific method, guided by reason and empirical evidence, can provide reliable knowledge about the natural world. It contrasts with supernatural explanations and pseudoscience, emphasizing the importance of testable hypotheses and critical thinking in reaching conclusions that are supported by evidence.
Why were gods and goddesses the belief of many Egyptians?
They were the explanations and theories of how everything was created and set into place.
How does science provide evidence for the existence of God?
Science does not provide direct evidence for the existence of God as it focuses on natural phenomena and observable data. The existence of God is a matter of faith and belief, which is beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
Is creationism a myth or a theory?
Creationism is a belief system that asserts that the universe and living beings originate from specific acts of divine creation. From a scientific perspective, creationism is considered a myth rather than a theory because it lacks empirical evidence and does not adhere to the scientific method of investigation and naturalistic explanations.
Why don't scientists believe in God?
You're making the question far too black-and-white. Many scientists believe in God, and many non-scientists do not. It is not always "belief in science" versus "belief in God".
