That's not just a "belief", that's what has been observed.
...of spiritual health.
Before, when science wasn't as advanced, scientists believed that an electric current flowed from the positive end to the negative end of a circuit. However, more advanced technology has allowed scientists to investigate this more thoroughly, and results state that electric current flows from the negative terminal to the positive terminal, thus called the electron flow. For reasons unknown, scientists have maintained the original idea of the current running from the positive terminal to the negative one, and have named it conventional flow.AnswerBefore the structure of the atom was understood, scientists such as Benjamin Franklin believed that an electric current was a flow of some sort of mysterious 'fluid' that moved from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure. The high pressure was considered to be 'positive' pressure and the low pressure was considered to be 'negative pressure'.Even though we now know that (in metallic conductors, anyway) that current is a flow of free electrons from negative to positive, for some weird reason many textbooks still show current as flowing from positive to negative! To differentiate between the two current directions, we use the terms 'electron flow', and 'conventional (or 'Franklinian') flow'.
because it is there religion belief
belief, certainty, confidence, dependence, faith, reliance, trust
Thomas Edison's greatest challenge was the development of a practical incandescent, electric light. Contrary to popular belief, he didn't "invent" the lightbulb, but rather he improved upon a 50-year-old idea. In 1879, using lower current electricity, a small carbonized filament, and an improved vacuum inside the globe, he was able to produce a reliable, long-lasting source of light.
That's not just a "belief", that's what has been observed.
That's not just a "belief", that's what has been observed.
Capital punishment is a belief and an actuality. It is not a universal belief or a universal actuality; the belief in capital punishment is only held by some people and capital punishment is practiced only in some places.
Atheists think that there is no universal meaning to life.
I know the answer to "the belief that perceptual principles are inborn and understood" is NAVITIST
Daoism
Daoism
You're making the question far too black-and-white. Many scientists believe in God, and many non-scientists do not. It is not always "belief in science" versus "belief in God".
The words between "beguile" and "belfry" are behave, behavior, behind, beholden and belay. The words are part of the ABC Universal Commercial Electric Telegraphic code.
Religion is a belief. A belief is a perspective of the truth. It may or may not be true. Religions have followers that believe that their perspective of the truth is true. However, even though they may or may not have the correct perspective of the truth, they still think they do, so religion is a universal belief system for those people that think that their perspective of the truth is true. If there was a universal belief system for a culture, every member of the culture would have the same perspective of the truth. However no culture has members that have the same perspective of the truth so no culture has a universal belief system. Even within a religion, there a different views held by members, so religion is not the universal belief system every culture uses. Is there a universal belief system? If there is, there must be a universal truth. If there is a universal truth, the universal belief system would be the correct perspective of the truth. The universal belief system would then define what thinking is true or not true. How would you discover the universal belief system? If the truth cannot change, only our perspective of it, it would be possible to discover the universal belief system by questioning every single perspective to see if the perspective can change. If the perspective can change, it would be the wrong perspective of the truth. Whatever remained after questioning would therefore constitute the universal belief system. Has this been done before? In order to discover the universal belief system, a person would be required to make himself or herself think the thoughts of all people and either prove or disprove these thoughts. If a pattern could be found, it would be possible to fast track the discovery process. Rather than questioning every single thought, thoughts would then be part of the pattern. If differences existed between the pattern and the thought pattern in other people, the pattern may or may not be the correct perspective. The pattern of thought that remained after questioning would be the correct perspective of the truth. If two or more thought patterns remained, no universal belief system would exist. A universal belief system has been proposed to exist. By using the philosophical pillar of the point of living, two different thought patterns at the subconscious level were questioned. Only one of these thought patterns remained. (In other words, there was no point in living if the other pattern was correct). This has been proposed as the universal belief system. Any thinking outside of the universal belief system would therefore constitute a psychological disorder. If correct, this discovery has the potential to totally change the way people think about psychological disorders and mental illness.
thomas edison
Beyond Belief Fact or Fiction - 1997 The Electric Chair was released on: USA: 25 May 1997