Want this question answered?
no. he lived in the 1600's
The cubs beet the phillies
No. It's actually an example of Newton's 2nd law of motion,in its vector form.
The force the other team will have to overcome to win is the sum of the forces exerted by you and your friend, which is 3 newtons + 8 newtons = 11 newtons. So, the other team will have to exert a force greater than 11 newtons to win the tug of war.
He was a hero and a little bite of villain with a small piece of ballsucker
ya i mean because he does not want to fight but yes i think he does seem upset about the war
Winfield Scott was the other Mexican War hero.
They thought it would be a short, glorious war with low casualties. That is why they rejected Winfield Scott's plan to wait till the blockade had starved and weakened the Confederacy, before moving in and attacking it.
earlobes
Scott captured Mexico City.
Civil War and the War of 1812.
Nobody one
No he did not fight in the Civil War
The Afgan war - which is in progress now (2010).
Bloody, as you would expect of war.
PENICILLIN
At the start of the Civil War, Winfield Scott was the Commanding General of the Union Army.