Well, not sure this is what the question means, but one way is that several discoveries build on discoveries from the past. If we didn't know about airplanes, it would be hard to imagine spaceships, and if we didn't know about typewriters, it may have been difficult to imagine computers. Telegraphs led to telephones in many ways... more discoveries lead to more discoveries.
Science can build aircons, but it also have a bad effect to our environment/society because of their CFCs
Science is science itself. Technology is using that science to design and build things. Same with engineering, you use science to design that steam engine.
pseudoscience fake science basically and scince made technology build things
Giving me the winning lotto numbers.
Science is simply a method of observation and experimentation to answer questions. There is no way to list pros and cons for such a basic idea. There can be pros and cons to specific applications of science, but not to science itself.
Build a boat and write the word science on it.
How do you build a working model of science and technology for games and sports?
Science can build aircons, but it also have a bad effect to our environment/society because of their CFCs
Evolution is a scientific theory, it in itself is not a science.
Science is science itself. Technology is using that science to design and build things. Same with engineering, you use science to design that steam engine.
You use bricks and stuff and just build, build and build! Have a go!
by how they are build and by physics
There are many ways in which you could build a simple working model of an ear for a science fair. You could build this out of paper mache for example.
They use science when they build big constructions.
Politics itself is not defined as a science, but political science, which applies the scientific method to the study of politics, is a science.
Science by itself is neither good or bad, it's just a tool. It's all in the usage. A hammer can be used both to build things up as well as destroying things. Considering that average life expectance is still rising, I think science has done more good than bad.
Not in itself, as morals are man-made rules and science seeks the rules of the universe.