Want this question answered?
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
From Wikipedia: Starting from August 1968, the Glomar Challenger embarked on a year-long scientific expedition, the Deep Sea Drilling Program, criss-crossing the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between South America and Africa and drilling core samples at specific locations. When the age of the samples was determined by paleontological and isotopic dating studies, this provided conclusive evidence for the seafloor spreading hypothesis, and, consequently, for continental drift.
During the Devonian Period is when vascular plants most likely evolved. The evidence of this time scale is that fossils dating back to the Devonian Period have been found.
During the Second World War, linear bands of positive and negative magnetic anomolies were found in the ocean floor, stretching for hundreds of miles, with an almost perfect symmetry either side of mid-ocean ridges. It was realised that these anomalies were evidence of periodic reversals of the earth's magnetic field. Molten basalt had been magnetised in the direction of the field and then cooled to 'fossilise' that direction. Each time the earth's magnetic field reversed, a stripe was added to the 'bar-code'. By dating onshore lava flows where magnetic reversals had occurred, a timescale of magnetic reversals was built up. It then became clear that, in the undersea anomalies, the youngest rocks were near the ridge, while the oldest were farther away and nearest the continents. Either side of the ridge, stripes of exactly the same age could be matched with each other. There was already evidence of continental drift, but this new evidence helped to explain how the earth's crust is moving and how the sea floor is spreading.
Carbon-dating can not be used to prove the age of the earth, so it can not be used either to prove a "young earth" nor to support the scientific age of the earth. Carbon-dating is useful for archaeology, where it can date evidence of human artefacts up to fifty thousand years old. Some less less informed "Young Earth" creationists do believe that carbon-dating was used to date the earth. They attempt, unsuccessfully, to undermine the science of carbon-dating in the belief that by doing so they undermine the scientific age of the earth, rather than because they constructively prove their point. The best estimates of the age of the earth have been arrived at by radioactive dating, but not by carbon-dating. Had techniques of radioactive dating not been invented, other known methods of dating the earth would prove that the world is more than a few million years old. Some of these are described in the related question, attached below.
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
Carbon dating
Spreading rumors about them or if they are dating someone try to make them break up
There is no evidence of them ever having dated.
They have never dated, she is young and he is to old for her. Plus, there is no evidence to support that they have been dating.
Yes we have stong evidence that she is.. we do not know who yet
classification, dating, and evaluation 100%
Our most provident evidence would be carbon dating and fossils.
There has been evidence of marijuana being used as medicine in China dating back to 2900 b.c.e., although there is no direct evidence on the first discoverer.
It is rumored that Harry is currently dating either Caroline Flack (X-tra Factor Host) or Emily Atack (star on The Inbetweeners), but there is no clear evidence that he is dating anyone.
people say Nicki Minaj is dating SB or safaree but its not yet confirmed there is no evidence but we know and as what we see they look like a happy couple
To summarize, there are three types of geological evidence of the age of the earth. These are:Gradual processes of rock formationThe fossil recordRadioactive dating