Want this question answered?
There are various reasons to use scientific journals. One is that it can be the basis of research. The research may have been done to either support or falsify specific hypothesis introduced by scientific journal(s). It can also support or falsify the findings of scientific journal(s). Another reason to use scientific journals is the other way around. Scientific journals can be used to support or falsify research findings. The main point is: scientific journals presents ideas and findings. Because hypothesis are deemed "plausible" until proven false, a research is somehow useless if scientific journals that only support the research findings are included. Findings that contradict the research data must be included. If not, then at least, the audience knows that there was either not enough information to contradict the research or the research findings are partly "true." Moreover, scientific journals tell the audience "on what basis did the researchers conducted their research on." Is there enough credibility? (Background) Information? etc.
Cell salt therapy, like homeopathy, is not based on scientific research but on provings. Provings are basically anecdotal evidence gathered from volunteers.
Scientific research has isolated hundreds of chemicals in essential oils, and has shown many essential oils to have anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and antiparasitic properties.
Stem cells can now be harvested from living hosts with no harm done. 2009 has seen the break through research.
Eat, Pray Love And let's not forget the scientific method. Scientific research should be done honestly, by observing as accurately as possible, without trying to make your observations fit into any pre-conceived theory that you may have. You should be just as willing for your theory to be proved false, as you are for your theory to be confirmed (whatever your theory may be). A scientist, above all, wants to learn the truth.
By taking away research funds if certain standards ar not met
By taking away research funds if certain standards ar not met
By taking away research funds if certain standards ar not met
For example, you might mean: Should government-funded researchers be held accountable? or Should medical trial research be conducted ...
taxpayers
the hypothesis
The purpose. (:
politicans
taxpayers
There is a growing amount of mainstream scientific research documenting the effectiveness of Rolf therapy.
Investigatory research involves exploring a specific topic or issue to gather information, analyze data, and form conclusions. It typically involves a systematic and structured approach to investigating a question or problem in order to gain insights and make informed decisions. This type of research often follows a formal process that includes defining the research question, collecting data, analyzing findings, and drawing conclusions.
This is research by governmental agencies such as NIH or NIMH (and many others). There is also research funded by the federal government done at various universities and corporations throughout the country.