answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Supreme Court has the unwritten policy of judicial review. This means that they can check amendments and bills that the other two branches of the federal government suggest. If a law seems to be unconstitutional, and not written in the constitution, the Supreme Court can decide it is unconstitutional.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does the judges decide if something is unconstitutional?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which group decides if state laws are unconstitutional?

In USA the Supreme court judges decide as to whether certain laws are constitutional or not. eg.In the Brown vs Board of education of TOPEKA 1954 case the supreme court ruled that the " separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional


What is the power of and check on the judicial branch?

The Judicial branch has the power to interpret the laws, or decide if they are unconstitutional. The checks on the Judicial branch are the power of the executive branch to enforce the laws and the power of the legislative branch to make laws.


What is something that goes against the?

Unconstitutional


Can the president override a decision of the Court?

No. The Supreme Court has the ability to declare something unconstitutional or not. If they have declared something unconstitutional then there is nothing the president can do about it.


Negligence judge or jury?

Judges decide questions of law. Juries decide issues of fact.


What did the delegates at the Annapolis Convention decide to do?

The delegates at the Annapolis Convention declared slavery to be unconstitutional.


WHAT SOMETHING that goes against the CONSTITUTION?

Unconstitutional


What's something that is against the Constitution?

Unconstitutional


What is Judicail Restraints?

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that says that judges should hesitate to strike down a law unless it is obviously unconstitutional. This encourages judges to limit their own powers.


In what way are the federal judges free to make decisions?

They can strike down any law they see as unconstitutional if it is challenged in court.


Prior are cases who's principles are used by judges to decide current cases are called?

Precedent cases are those whose principles are used by judges to decide current cases. Judges rely on the decisions and reasoning of prior cases to guide their judgment in similar situations.


Can The Supreme Court have the power to decide if laws are unconstitutional can the president overturn its decision with veto power?

No