Scientists today rely heavily on empirical evidence, experimentation, and peer review to develop and validate their ideas, while Greek philosophers used more deductive reasoning, logic, and thought experiments. Additionally, modern scientists work within established frameworks and theories, building on existing knowledge through collaboration and specialization, whereas Greek philosophers often sought universal truths through individual contemplation and debate.
Modern scientists tend to rely on the scientific method, which involves experimentation, observation, and empirical evidence to develop ideas. In contrast, ancient Greek philosophers developed ideas through contemplation, reasoning, and dialogue, often based on logic and rational argumentation without necessarily relying on systematic experimentation or empirical evidence.
Philosophy is concerned with understanding the nature of reality, knowledge, and existence through reasoning and reflection, whereas science aims to explain natural phenomena through empirical evidence and experimentation. Philosophy explores abstract concepts and principles, while science focuses on observable facts and data to develop theories and models. Both disciplines contribute to our understanding of the world, but they differ in their methodologies and areas of study.
Some Enlightenment thinkers differed in their views on the role of religion in society. For example, while Voltaire advocated for religious tolerance and criticized organized religion, Rousseau believed in a more personal, emotional connection to spirituality. Additionally, philosophers like Locke focused on individual rights and freedoms, while Hobbes emphasized the need for strong governmental control to maintain order.
Hellenistic philosophers, such as the Stoics and Epicureans, focused more on ethics and how to live a good life, while Aristotle's philosophy covered a wide range of subjects, including metaphysics and logic. Additionally, Hellenistic philosophers placed more emphasis on personal transformation and inner peace, whereas Aristotle focused on understanding the natural world and the principles of logic.
The US and the Philippines differ in terms of size, population, and economic development. The US is a large country with a diverse population and a highly developed economy, while the Philippines is a smaller country with a growing population and a developing economy. Both countries share a history of colonial rule, but have different cultural influences and political systems.
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
emphasis on emotion and admirtation for the noble savage
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Theories are proven. Hypothesis are ideas.
Unlike the people of Columbus's time, many scientists in Hellenistic times knew that the Earth was round.
the jobs and services are the same
Men have a higher rate.
Yes.
The main difference is that the ancient Greeks - indeed practically everyone until the 17th century - used to simply believe what eminent people said; Aristotle said that house flies had four legs and that was the belief for hundreds of years. Ptolomy said that sailing over the equator would make a ship catch fire and everyone believed him. Nowadays, scientists employ the scientific method which, at its simplest, was described to me as "someone says something is true and everyone else tries to prove him wrong." Another more subtle difference is that Greek philosophers would probably claim they searched for truth; modern scientific progress is made by demonstrating existing theories false - so it's more a search for falseness than truth.
They differed because they used theology and cosmology to liberate their thoughts on why things happened in their world.
An emerging idea has been examined by a large number of scientists.