Toms storry immediatley contradict mayellas testimony by
Tom's story immediately contradicts Mayella's testimony when he states that he did not have any physical contact with her, while she claimed that he had attacked and assaulted her. Additionally, Tom explains that he was just helping Mayella with some chores as a favor, whereas she alleged that he had forced himself on her. These conflicting narratives highlight the inconsistency and falsehood in Mayella's testimony.
tom
Mayella Ewell's testimony in the trial of Tom Robinson in "To Kill a Mockingbird" alleges that Tom Robinson raped her. However, it is later revealed that she fabricated the story to cover up her own advances towards Tom and to avoid repercussions from her abusive father.
situational irony
A deposition is the sworn testimony of a person which is recorded by an official court recorder. A deposition is different than testimony at a trial because it is not given in the prescence of a judge. However, it is considered testimony given under oath. It can be used to contradict testimony given at trial by the same witness. For example, if at a depostion the witness says he saw a blue 4-door Ford Taurus and later at the trial he states he saw a red two door Chevy, a depostion statement can be used to show the witness has changed his story.
Bob's testimony in Chapter 17 of what book or story? Please provide more specific information for a detailed response.
He has spoken solely of himself since the story began.
Science observes what is, and seeks an understanding of why and how. Superstition adopts a story of why and how, and seeks evidence for it.
the plaintiff can be charged with lying to police, or false testimony.
He will give his side of the story, the same way the plaintiff did when plaintiff testified.
Crisis
The reader is meant to feel the tension of the conflict immediately
In "The Book of Monsters," Briggs brought into question the accuracy of Jose's testimony by highlighting inconsistencies and contradictions in his statements. He challenged Jose's credibility by pointing out gaps in his story and questioned the reliability of his memory and perception of events. Ultimately, Briggs aimed to cast doubt on the validity of Jose's testimony and undermine his credibility as a witness.
Irony. Irony occurs when the opposite of what is expected happens, creating a sense of surprise or humor for the audience.