0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is scientific inquiry important?
Scientific inquiry is important because it gives us a chance to solve problems by using what we already know. It forces us to use our critical thinking skills. At the end of the scientific inquiry, we end up learning something new that we have never learned before. It also gives us the chance to become scientifically curious. I hope this helps :)
Can a scientific inquiry be constructed by any question?
Usually, science is reasoned deductively, through an initial hypothesis posed upon an inquiry. So, yes, and no. If you're writing a paper and working with the inquiry itself, then you're using a more philosophical and inductive approach, rather than a scientific one. Although, they frequently fuse together to become one of the same.
Can a scientific theory become a scientific idea?
The other way around. Its hard to become a theory.
When do scientific method become valuable?
scientific method become valuable internalized as a process to solve a problem
Does a scientific law become a scientific theory?
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Is scientific inquiry important?
Scientific inquiry is important because it gives us a chance to solve problems by using what we already know. It forces us to use our critical thinking skills. At the end of the scientific inquiry, we end up learning something new that we have never learned before. It also gives us the chance to become scientifically curious. I hope this helps :)
Can a scientific inquiry be constructed by any question?
Usually, science is reasoned deductively, through an initial hypothesis posed upon an inquiry. So, yes, and no. If you're writing a paper and working with the inquiry itself, then you're using a more philosophical and inductive approach, rather than a scientific one. Although, they frequently fuse together to become one of the same.
Why is scientific inquiry a process with many paths not a rigid sequence of paths?
The short answer is that a rigid process for inquiry is the scientific equivalent of dogma, encoding a bias that implies an inequality of hypotheses (and people) that is contradictory to the scientific method. This results not in standardization and improved trust, but in eroding trust and periodic fragmentation. We do actually already have such constraints on the inquiry process in the form of funding, religious, moral and legal constraints, which are completely appropriate given that Science is intentionally rational, apathetic towards emotion, and amoral. However even though we do have these constraints, and because we don't have a common base for religion, morality, or legality, they already have since the beginning been causing the fragmentation spoken of above; the more rigid and detached from the consumers of the science the constraints on inquiry become, the faster and more antagonistic the fragmenting gets. There's a lot more detail, these are the essentials.
What scientific process causes something to become putrid?
what scientific causes something to become putrid
Can a scientific theory become a scientific idea?
The other way around. Its hard to become a theory.
When do scientific method become valuable?
scientific method become valuable internalized as a process to solve a problem
When did the tradition of the carrying of the Olympic Torch begin?
the fire was reintroduced at the 1928 summer Olympics in Amsterdam when did it starti think it started in 1936 but that's when it became a tradition when it was in Berlin but Amsterdam started it but did not become a tradition
. A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if?
A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if the hypothesis is tested extensively and competing hypotheses are eliminated.
Does the president of the US have to use the bible for the inauguartion?
NO, but it has become a tradition.
What is the difference scientific theories between scientific laws?
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
How could humanists become critics of tradition?
A humanist is one who virtually worships humanity and wishes humanity to thrive. A traditionalist is one who embraces tradition regardless of whether it has a positive effect on humans or not. Therefore, a humanist can easily become a critic of tradition. http:/www.politicallyincorrectts.com
Does a scientific law become a scientific theory?
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
