Good... waves bring nutrients and food to shore on a regular basis, exposing different ecosystems which are neither suited for water or land but both. There are numerous bird species that live on small sea animals washed ashore. In shallow areas, waves can create sand bars that protect the mainland or even form islands for people. Waves also transfer massive amounts of oxygen into water, that aquatic animal life uses. Waves also increase the absorption of CO2 from air to water.
Bad... erosion. Waves erode beaches and ocean cliffs, witness the reshaping of the coasts.
well, wave power is a renewable energy source so it is far better for the environment. it doesn't have an impact - it isn'tgreat for the environment but it isn't bad either. therefore referring back tot the question, no, it does NOT have an impact on our precious environment at all.
Personally i think we should use wave energy because it well help the environment and it can be cheaper than the regular electricity and fossil fuel. SO I WOULD SAY YES TO WAVE ENERGY
The answer depends upon the conditions of the environment. If the available energy to the wave generator is unbounded, then there is no impact on amplitude as frequency increases. However if total energy rate is constant, then the amplitude must decrease as frequency increases in order to maintain the same energy output.
wind energyif you read careful it's a joke :)
making the home more hot/cold
well, wave power is a renewable energy source so it is far better for the environment. it doesn't have an impact - it isn'tgreat for the environment but it isn't bad either. therefore referring back tot the question, no, it does NOT have an impact on our precious environment at all.
well, wave power is a renewable energy source so it is far better for the environment. it doesn't have an impact - it isn'tgreat for the environment but it isn't bad either. therefore referring back tot the question, no, it does NOT have an impact on our precious environment at all.
all living things require energy so no energy, no environment
Only in very small ways do they impact the environment. Renewable sources of energy emit no polluting greenhouse gases, so they have no effect on global warming. Solar panels on your roof have no impact. Wind turbines have a slight visual impact. Dams impact the environment of the croplands above them. Tidal power may obstruct shipping and fish movements. Wave power machines may obstruct shipping and whale movements.
website no work and eg4yh
Personally i think we should use wave energy because it well help the environment and it can be cheaper than the regular electricity and fossil fuel. SO I WOULD SAY YES TO WAVE ENERGY
It has very low energy
waves slow down as they approach the shoreline!
Not much pollution unless there is a nuclear reaction.
The answer depends upon the conditions of the environment. If the available energy to the wave generator is unbounded, then there is no impact on amplitude as frequency increases. However if total energy rate is constant, then the amplitude must decrease as frequency increases in order to maintain the same energy output.
I would say the sun
Bikes do not require energy like gasoline or electrical power... hence they have no impact on the environment and are energy effecient