due to prolong use, it was had a belching & shuttle's foundations faced a very highest burn then there ceramic parts were consist condemned condition
I think it was Endeavor. I think I'm wrong though.
I was almost certainly sure that it was the shuttle enterprise in the early 80's, I remember trek fans demanding it from NASA. I could be wrong though!
The wings of a space shuttle are primarily used for atmospheric flight and re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere. During most of its mission in space, the shuttle operates in the vacuum of space where wings are not necessary for propulsion or maneuvering. However, they are crucial for controlled descent and landing back on Earth.
I am guessing in the space shuttle but from what i here not really. maybe from meteors and comets there is a sound when it hits planets but other than that i really don't think so i could be wrong.
The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster on January 28, 1986, was caused by the failure of an O-ring seal in one of the solid rocket boosters. This failure allowed hot gases to escape, leading to the breakup of the shuttle and the tragic loss of the crew. The decision to launch in cold weather conditions, which compromised the O-rings' flexibility, was a contributing factor.
Building a shuttle for NASHA
a very long time.average speed of the space shuttle orbiting the earth is around 17,000 miles per hour.the distance from earth to mercury is about 43,000,000 miles.so traveling at 17,000 mph it would take about 2,529 hours or about 105 days to get to mercury.I might be wrong.
There are so many things that could go bad, it's hard to enumerate them. It could be anything from planetoide impact, through computer failure, fuel tank rupture, hull decompression to toilet malfunction.
Everyone just knew that the world was flat... If that was wrong, what else could be wrong...
the Canadarm is the crane-like deviced on the space shuttle orbiter that lifts items from the cargo hold and releases them into orbit. It is also used to position astronauts and mission specialists to allow to perform a specific task. It is called the Canadarm because it was designed, developed, and manufactured by the Canadian space agency. WRONG! It was designed, developed, manufactured and tested by Spar Aerospace Ltd., a Canadian company. I know--I was the program manager for Canadarm I. Terry Ussher
Although at first glance it appears wrong, the flag on the shuttle Orbiter is not truly backward. The regulation for displaying a U.S. flag on a national vehicle states that the star field must be positioned at the front of the vessel (the nose cone end of the shuttle), as if the flag were "flying" along the side of the ship. This causes the flag to look as though it were backward on one side of the Shuttle.
The G force on a Space Shuttle at takeoff is 3G. This lasts until the SRBs (Solid Rocket Boosters) quit.DUDE, your so wrong! Try 6 + More G forces... On a realistic average. Just ask NASA.6+G would get the shuttle going way too fast too low, and it would rip apart with air flow pressure. first answer is right, if actually a slight over estimate. one of those Gs is actually 1G of lovely earthly gravity too. it barely accelerates at 2G. (just ask nasa) or anyone who's sustained 6Gs for two minutes.