Nobody knows.
It's not even certain a big crunch will ever occur. At the moment, there just doesn't appear to be enough mass in the Universe to halt the current expansion, let alone slow it down or reverse it.
The likelihood of a tsunami hitting Atlanta in the future is extremely low, as Atlanta is located far inland and not near any major bodies of water where tsunamis typically occur.
The "Big Freeze" does not replace the Big Bang, it is only an extrapolation of the current theory into the far distant future. It may or may not be "true" as there are other extrapolations will different results.
will we make things out of plasma in the far future
The universe is not destroyed, but rather it is constantly evolving and changing. The destruction of the universe is a theoretical concept that is often discussed in the context of scientific theories such as the Big Crunch or the Heat Death of the universe, but these scenarios are not guaranteed to happen.
Shield volcanoes may occur far from any plate boundaries.
The Big Bang theory is widely supported by astronomers and astrophysicists, because there is considerable evidence for it; the 4 degree Kelvin cosmic background radiation, the fact that space seems to be expanding and the evidence of the red-shift of far-away galaxies. This doesn't make it TRUE; we will probably never be able to PROVE that the Big Bang happened. But the evidence is consistent. For the Big Crunch hypothesis; Not so much. One of the fundamental beliefs in physics is "symmetry"; that everything balances. It is an elegant belief, but is not always supported by evidence. Unfortunately for the Big Crunch, there seems to be little actual evidence. Yes, it would make nice symmetry, a lovely balance, a nice closure to the Big Bang. But of evidence we have seen little. Right now, the observable universe seems to lack anywhere near enough mass to cause the universe to slow its expansion and collapse back upon itself (perhaps creating the next Big Bang). One of the arguments for "dark matter" is that if there is massive amounts of dark, unobservable matter, that this might "close" the universe and bring about the Big Crunch. But without more evidence, this is a circular argument. So, I would say, "No, this is not a trust-able theory." The better answer is, as it often is, "We do not know.".
The Big Bang theory is widely supported by astronomers and astrophysicists, because there is considerable evidence for it; the 4 degree Kelvin cosmic background radiation, the fact that space seems to be expanding and the evidence of the red-shift of far-away galaxies. This doesn't make it TRUE; we will probably never be able to PROVE that the Big Bang happened. But the evidence is consistent. For the Big Crunch hypothesis; Not so much. One of the fundamental beliefs in physics is "symmetry"; that everything balances. It is an elegant belief, but is not always supported by evidence. Unfortunately for the Big Crunch, there seems to be little actual evidence. Yes, it would make nice symmetry, a lovely balance, a nice closure to the Big Bang. But of evidence we have seen little. Right now, the observable universe seems to lack anywhere near enough mass to cause the universe to slow its expansion and collapse back upon itself (perhaps creating the next Big Bang). One of the arguments for "dark matter" is that if there is massive amounts of dark, unobservable matter, that this might "close" the universe and bring about the Big Crunch. But without more evidence, this is a circular argument. So, I would say, "No, this is not a trust-able theory." The better answer is, as it often is, "We do not know.".
probably surf,hydro pump,crunch,and maybe dragon rage depending on how far you are in the game
He lives in a dome on earth far into the future.
HowHow far the big three agreed with each other far the big three agreed with each
Some scientists now believe that there already have been more than one "big bang", with each "big bang" event creating an entire universe. The name scientists use for the resulting collection of universes is a multiverse. Fortunately, the "big bangs" would have been so far separated in the absolute infinity of space that each event did not affect the existing universes. This hypothesis implies that, over many billions of years, future "big bangs" can still occur somewhere in the vastness of space, but an observer in our universe would never be aware of it.
it was suggested that the world will end because scientists created a black hole the credit crunch were 700bn was lost