It showed that segregation damaged children's emotions.
After using the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were a range of emotions among Americans. Some felt relief that the war would soon be over, while others felt pride and a sense of accomplishment. However, there were also concerns and moral dilemmas about the devastation caused by the bombs and the loss of civilian lives.
To appeal to feelings and emotions - apex
What happens in the past is all history. Whether it is of historical significance depends on one`s own point of view. What is historically important to you or your community or race depends on how you view the event. It also depends on your personal emotions or feelings at the time and on hindsight. History can be interpreted in many different ways, and one of the means of interpreting it depends on personal experience. Another is dependent on which commentator you choose to believe. Many events in history are distorted by people with hidden agendas to distort what happened in actual fact. I`m afraid there is no simple answer, but the important thing is that you had the intelligence to ask the question. What is important is that you decide.
of couse he does he is a human isn't he.
Yes, learning can occur without feelings or emotions being involved. People can acquire knowledge through logical reasoning, observation, and understanding without necessarily experiencing strong emotions. However, emotions can often enhance learning by increasing motivation, focus, and memory retention.
Answer 1Who knows. Maybe they have a strong sense of self identity.Answer 2For many Jewish Americans, Israel serves as a focal-point and a national home. In the same way that many Irish-Americans have strong emotions as concerns Ireland, Jewish-Americans have strong emotions concerning Israel. These emotions have only been heightened and strengthened by the unbalanced criticism that Israel receives and the historical victim-mentality that Jews have regarding discrimination and Anti-Semitism.
Yes.. Judgement will be effected by our emotions if we are not strong enough to separate the issue from our emotions. If we can look at the issue based on reasoning minus the emotional factor, the judgment will be much more better.
Stupidity is not classified as an emotion; rather, it is typically seen as a lack of intelligence or understanding in a particular situation. Emotions involve feelings and reactions to external stimuli, while stupidity is more closely related to knowledge and reasoning abilities.
Subjective reasoning is based on personal opinions, emotions, and interpretations, while objective reasoning is based on verifiable facts, evidence, and logic. Subjective reasoning is influenced by individual perspectives and biases, whereas objective reasoning aims to be impartial and unbiased. Both forms of reasoning can be important depending on the context and topic being discussed.
Mr. Gradgrind's comparison of people to reasoning animals in "Hard Times" illustrates his belief in utilitarianism and his emphasis on facts and logic over emotions and creativity. This demonstrates his rigid and mechanical view of humanity, emphasizing the importance of practical knowledge and productivity above all else.
With mixed emotions
they can use their political knowledge. and select their leaders on the basis of knowledge not on emotions.
Poetic reason was a subject of great debate in ancient philosophy, less so today. Many ancients believed the only way to true knowledge or any furthering of existing knowledge could only be done by means of logical, formulaic, syllogistic reasoning. I believe it was Aristotle who suggested that "thinking outside the box" or poetic reasoning could be as or more effective in some situations. I believe most who valued poetic reasoning believed that the combination of creativity and emotions helped the mind to see farther than logic alone could. Hope this helps!
authentic attitudes
Do you mean knowledge of any kind? Absolutely not. I think emotions are notoriously unreliable. They are useful, and they can be good. But they don't fit in too well if what's called for is clarity of thought.
Faulty reasoning can result from not thinking something through, not considering all the possibilities, not having all the facts or information, allowing your emotions to override logical thought, or a number of other things.