because it is technology
Miranda v. Arizona
miranda vs. Arizona
They use......Radar. that is the name for it. they also use Laser technology called......Laser.
Law enforcement has always tried to keep up with technology. Maybe they've lagged a few years as they have to get funding from the government, but that has ALWAYS been the case. There's no special date when it suddenly got easier.
Technology makes absolutely no difference. If the offense is a crime according to statutes passed by the state legislature then law enforcment must and will respond to it. The second question is MUCH too open-ended to address, without being narrowed down.
the fall of Al Capone and John Gotti
Law enforcement agencies use LexisNexis Accurint to solve cases faster, minimise case costs, and free up staff to be able to work on higher priority cases.
One example is that of DNA technology used in investigating crime scenes.
The role of the federal government in civil rights enforcement changed because African Americans got their rights guaranteed by law.
Law enforcement was hampered by the widespread corruption of law enforcement officers and other public officials.
Miranda v. Arizona
The four generalizations about American law enforcement are: Decentralization: Law enforcement is characterized by a decentralized structure, with thousands of local, state, and federal agencies operating independently. Professionalism: There has been a trend towards increased professionalism and training within law enforcement agencies, emphasizing ethics and community relations. Community Policing: Many agencies have adopted community policing strategies to foster partnerships with the communities they serve, focusing on crime prevention and community engagement. Use of Technology: Law enforcement increasingly utilizes technology, including data analytics and surveillance tools, to enhance crime-solving capabilities and improve operational efficiency.