An interpretation of the second Amendment that corresponds with the ruling in District of Columbia vs. Heller is that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.
idk man i need this answer too!!! for civics homework do u have anything yet??
One of the first times that the Supreme Court interpreted the full scope of the First Amendment was in 1925. The case was that of Gitlow v. New York.
This amendment speaks to state militias and the right to bear arms. Added: In a recent Supreme Court ruling the right of individuals to keep and bear arms (at least at the Federal level) was how the Amendment was interpreted.
make rights contained in the bill of rights applicable to the states.
I need to find a supreme court case based on the second amendment and write an essay contrasting two Court Justice's opinions.
the supreme court
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1876)The US Supreme Court held the Second Amendment only applied to the Federal government, and that gun regulation was a state's rights issue.
There is no thu amendment.
it proposes and passes amendments
The first amendment states that everyone is entitled to freedom of religion and should not be a law in favor of any religion or prohibiting a religion.
ninth amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment has been used by the Supreme Court to overturn many court decisions in order to enforce equal rights. Specifically, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been interpreted to prohibit states from discriminating against individuals based on race, gender, and other protected characteristics. This has led to landmark decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education and Loving v. Virginia.
Polygamy is not in any amendment, it was outlawed by a Supreme Court decision.