it will stay at rest until acted upon by an outside force
fu
Answer: The vehicle that initiates the collision is at fault.
As long as the parked vehicle is parked properly and not illegally parked in any manner, then the vehicle that rear-ended the parked car is at fault. Now if the parked car is sitting illegally (such as double parked or parked in a no parking zone, etc.) then the parked car is at fault or even both the parked car AND the car that hits it are BOTH at fault.
lol that is random
Generally speaking, the driver in motion is considered to be at fault when a parked car is hit, even if the car was parked illegally. The exception to this would be if the car was parked in a dangerous, hard-to-see location and the driver in motion could not have reasonably avoided hitting it. For example, if a car is parked on a sharp curve in the travel lane of a narrow road, and the driver of a car driving around the curve at the speed limit would not be able to see the parked car until too close to it to avoid a collision, then the driver might not be liable for damage to the parked car, and indeed the driver who parked the car might be liable for damage to the car that hit it.
POV: pepe popo check -gnome
The car that rolled into the parked car is at fault.
It would be the car who had parked illegally because he was not parked in a legal spot.
Example:"The guy who crashed his bike into a parked car was realy madcap."
Example sentence - I parked my car in the driveway each night.
If a car is parked (so it wasnt moving, standing still), the other car is in fault.
depends on whether or not the car is parked well. if the car is parked properly, in the right spot then it should be the car that hit it that is at fault.