We know that if a father is colorblind and the mother is neither colorblind nor a carrier, then the sons will not be colorblind. So, using logic, that means that the father can't cause a son to become colorblind. Process of elimination would point towards whenever a son is colorblind that it comes from the mother. A diagram explaining how colorblindness is inherited can be viewed in the related links.
the mother
It is just the DNA lottery. If neither parent is colorblind that just means that one of them (or both of them) have recessive genes for colorblindness that happened to show up in this particular child.
If neither parent still live in the original jurisdiction, it can be transferred to the jurisdictions of either parent.
If physical custody of a child is transferred from one parent to the other, you need to petition the court for a change in support order. It is possible the other parent will now be paying you child support.
the guardian should file to have the order transferred to them as well as file on the parent currently receiving it to also pay. Or the obligor parent should file for custody.
Yes.
The obligation should not end, but rather transferred to the now nun-custodial parent.
Each parent must have the recessive allele for colorblindness.
Colorblindness is not determined by blood type. Everyone has two alleles for blood type: A, B, or O. If one parent is AO and the other is BO, the child can be AB, AO, BO, or OO.
Yes, when the primary parent goes on Welfare. Authority to collect is transferred to them.
Parent didn't sign Masters Promissory note so it is technically not the parent's loan or responsibility right? Because of this, can a Direct PLUS loan get transferred to the child if a mistake was made in the loan process?
Not if the obligor parent still lives in the state or origin.
Yes