The question makes very little more sense than does "how is gravity not true?" We may not fully understand either, but we've got a pretty good handle on the core of it.
Micro evolution can lead to macroevolution
Described by the definition for evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms.The prefered terms are evolution ( instead of microevolution ) and speciation ( instead of macroevolution ).
Mainly because they do not understand the process of evolution, or they refuse to believe it on fundamentalist grounds.
No, they are not evidence for ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny.
false
True. That is the definition of evolution.
sorry, you cannot prove that something is true if it is not true!
True.
True
That depends on who you ask. Some even believe both are true - 'Theistic Evolution.'
Not everything has to be evolution if evolution is true which I believe it is not true,my best answer would be development.
Since it was still a theory, there are still no comcrete facts that it is true.
True.
Yes, the theory of evolution is widely accepted as a scientific fact. It explains the diversity of living organisms on Earth through the process of natural selection, genetic variation, and adaptation over time. Multiple lines of evidence from various scientific fields support the theory of evolution.
Evolution is a belief in which people evolved from ape like figures. There is some scientific evidence in proving that this is true.
although science does matter evolution might be true to some religion but not to all
Micro evolution can lead to macroevolution